Skip to content

European Legislature endorses increased wolf hunts

Reduced standing or position reported in event or issue.

In 2023, as reported by the designated federal agency, a staggering 5727 farm animals met their...
In 2023, as reported by the designated federal agency, a staggering 5727 farm animals met their demise or sustained injuries at the hands of wolves, with a significant majority being sheep.

Loosened Restrictions: EU Allows More Wolf Culling, Sparking Controversy

European Legislature endorses increased wolf hunts

After a heated debate, the European Parliament has relaxed the rules for wolf hunting in the EU. A majority of MEPs voted to reduce the status of wolves from "strictly protected" to "protected", a move that still requires ratification by EU member states. This alteration is influenced by a rise in the number of farm animals attacked by wolves, and a push from many countries to protect their livestock more aggressively.

Farm Animal Predation, a Rising ConcernWolves in the EU face an increased probability of being hunted in the future. This shift from "strictly protected" to "protected" status heralds greater leeway for EU member states to deal with their wolf populations. Countries have already advocated for such a change to mitigate the predation of livestock, particularly sheep and cattle.

A Gradual ImplementationCurrently, Germany needs to modify its national law to activate the reduced protection status for wolves. Since the change in the Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive (FFH) does not have an "automatic" effect on German law, amendments to the Federal Nature Conservation Act and the Federal Hunting Act are necessary. The new federal government's coalition agreement stipulates that the decision at the EU level should be implemented swiftly in German law.

Specific Wolves Under ThreatLegal removal of troublesome wolves will be permitted, and they may be included in hunting law promptly. The status of the wolf as a protected species will remain unchanged, with the intention that problematic animals will be targeted instead. This approach is designed to offer regions with more widespread problems a simpler means of handling the wolf.

Criticism of the DecisionCritics of the decision, such as the Greens, argue that there is no scientific basis for the change. They believe that improved measures could secure farm animals without resorting to shooting more wolves. Another critic, German animal protection party MEP Sebastian Everding, has labelled the process as "scandalous."

"We are experiencing the fastest species extinction in Earth's history, and the EU's solution to a problem humans have created - grazing without proper herd protection - is to kill a strictly protected species," Everding said.

Historical IncidentsWolf attacks on farm animals are a significant concern for farmers, particularly those engaged in grazing. The number of incidents involving sheep and cattle has been increasing, resulting in significant problems for these farmers. The Federal Documentation and Advisory Centre on the Wolf reported a steep rise in the number of livestock killed or injured by wolves over the last decade, with over 5,700 animals affected by 2023. Even EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has experienced personal loss; in September 2022, a gray wolf near Hannover in her native Burgdorf-Beinhorn in Lower Saxony killed her 30-year-old pony, Dolly.

Key Concerns and Implications

On Wolf Populations

  • Regional Variations: Likelihood of increased culling and removal in regions with higher conflict levels, which may impede local wolf population growth.
  • Uncertainty in Conservation: The change from strict protection may lead to local drops or fragmentation of wolf populations in certain regions.
  • Scientific versus Political Priorities: There is a risk that the decision focuses more on political and economic interests instead of prioritizing scientific conservation principles, potentially jeopardizing long-term biodiversity goals.

On Farm Animal Protection

  • Improved Security: Farmers and landowners may benefit from more robust legal tools to shield their livestock.
  • Reduced Conflict and Losses: Greater flexibility in management is expected to bring about a reduction in economic losses and a better coexistence between wolves and rural communities.
  • Potential Overreach: In some cases, management measures may become too permissive, leading to excessive culling and possibly undermining the ecological role of wolves.

Overview

The decision represents a delicate balance between biodiversity conservation and rural economic interests. While it offers new tools for addressing human-wolf conflicts, it also presents uncertainties for long-term wolf conservation and underscores the ongoing tension between ecological science and local stakeholder concerns.

| Dimension | Current/Future Impact ||-----------------------|-----------------------|| Legal Protection | Downgraded from "strictly protected" to "protected" || Member State Flexibility | Increased, regional management options || Conservation Status | Must remain "favorable" at national level || Wolf Population Trend | Growth may slow or reverse in conflict areas || Farm Animal Protection | Improved legal tools and management || Environmental Concerns | Potential loss of biodiversity, over-culling risks |

Key Takeaway

The decision signifies a shift towards accommodating both biodiversity conservation and rural economic interests. While it offers fresh tools for resolving human-wolf conflicts, it also raises concerns about the long-term conservation of wolves and the tension between ecological science and local stakeholder demands.

  • In the wake of the European Parliament's decision, the protection status of wolves in the EU could potentially be at risk, as they are now labelled as "protected" rather than "strictly protected".
  • The change in the EU wolf protection policy has stirred criticism from environmental groups like the Greens, who argue that there is no scientific basis for the alteration, and question the approach of shooting more wolves to handle farm animal predation.
  • Despite the backlash, the decision may provide farmers and landowners with more robust legal tools to protect their livestock, thus reducing conflicts and economic losses.
  • The change in the Fauna-Flora-Habitat Directive (FFH) in the EU has permitted legal removal of troublesome wolves, specifically targeting problematic animals that are causing issues in regions with higher conflict levels.
  • The new EU wolf policy could lead to local drops or fragmentation of wolf populations in certain regions, raising concerns about its long-term implications for biodiversity conservation and the protection of this endangered species.

Read also:

Latest