EU ministers revisit Denmark's proposal for offshore asylum facilities in discussions regarding migration matters
Debate Heats Up: Migrant Return Centers Beyond EU Borders
Let's weigh in! Share your opinions and experiences below, and reach out to our news team at if you've got a question or suggestion for our journalists. Commenting guidelines and our terms of use apply, so remember to stay civil, constructive, and within topic.
Log in to leave your thoughts.
European Union at a Crossroads: Setting up migrant return centers off-EU boundaries gathers momentum among home affairs ministers, as they grapple with surging hard-line electoral win in some EU nations, leading to a harsher stance on migration irregularities.
What's Next: Examining the Options
Amid growing political pressure, EU leaders might consider partnering with various countries to host these migrant return centers, also known as "return hubs," outside the bloc as part of a broader strategy to tackle irregular migrant influx and improve return rates. The potential involvement of countries varies and is usually pursued through bilateral or multilateral agreements.
Location, Location, Location:
The Italy-Albania agreement of 2023 offers an example of what these collaborations could look like, initially aimed at sheltering non-vulnerable asylum seekers hailing from secured nations but later evolving to focus on return procedures for individuals whose asylum applications have been dismissed.
Whipping 'em Out:
If established, these centers mainly target migrants who are given final deportation orders but persist within EU borders. The emphasis is on deporting the difficult-to-remove cases, in efforts to improve return rates across the continent.
Winds of Change:
Mounting factors influence the EU's stance on migrant return centers located outside the bloc:
- Low Return Rates: Currently, only around 20% of those ordered by EU courts to depart the continent actually return[1][3].
- Security Concerns: The EU aims to reinforce its migration policies, with a keen eye on implementing more stringent measures where potential security threats are present[4].
- Political Pressure: Support for this stricter approach to migration flows from right-wing parties within the EU, who advocate for a more robust stance on immigration matters[4].
Bumps in the Road:
Despite the attractiveness of the idea, challenges and controversy surround the proposal:
- Legal issues: Concerns arise over legal and constitutional implications, demonstrated by the Italy-Albania agreement being temporarily blocked by Italian courts[1][2].
- Human Rights Issues: Over a hundred human rights organizations have cautioned that outsourcing migration administration may lead to human rights violations[3][4].
- It's interesting to brainstorm about the potential impact of setting up migrant return centers outside EU boundaries, especially in light of the growing political pressure on EU leaders to address surging migration issues.
- One possible solution could be partnerships with various countries to host these so-called "return hubs" as part of a broader strategy to improve return rates for irregular migrants.
- A good example of this collaboration is the Italy-Albania agreement from 2023, initially aiming to shelter non-vulnerable asylum seekers but later focusing on return procedures for rejected applicants.
- Establishing these centers would mainly target migrants who persist within EU borders despite receiving final deportation orders, with the aim of improving return rates across the continent.
- However, it's important to consider the potential challenges and controversy surrounding this proposal, such as legal and human rights issues, which have been raised by various organizations and courts.
