Ukraine Strengthens Anti-Corruption Institutions Amidst International Scrutiny
Ensuring the ideal operation of anti-corruption bodies in Ukraine is crucial for their self-sustaining performance - Braze
In a significant turn of events, Ukraine has made strides in its anti-corruption reforms following a period of controversy. The turbulent mid-2025 saw the approval of Draft Law No. 12414, which granted the Prosecutor General's Office control over the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), raising concerns about their independence[2][3][4]. This move sparked nationwide protests and criticism from the EU and G7 ambassadors[3][4].
Reversing Controversial Legislation
In response to public pressure and international concerns, the Ukrainian Parliament passed a new bill proposed by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, restoring the independence of NABU and SAPO[3][5]. This reversal was seen as a vital step in upholding Ukraine's commitment to anti-corruption reforms, a key condition for its EU candidate status[4][5].
Enhancing Asset Management
On July 27, 2025, President Zelenskyy signed another law aimed at strengthening the National Agency of Ukraine for the Identification, Search, and Management of Assets Derived from Corruption and Other Crimes (ARMA). This law promotes efficient and corruption-proof asset management through reforms such as an independent audit and competitive selection processes for the agency's leadership[1].
Ongoing Challenges
Despite these steps forward, Ukraine's anti-corruption efforts continue to face challenges, including ongoing political interference and the need for continued institutional strengthening. The resilience of civil society and the government's commitment to these reforms remain crucial for Ukraine's progress towards EU membership and long-term stability[3][5].
International Response and Relations
The European Union has expressed concern over these developments in Ukraine, considering reforms essential for closer European integration[6]. However, no specific actions or measures taken by other EU countries in response to these developments have been disclosed[7]. Regarding Latvia's relations with Ukraine, no information about potential impacts has been reported[8].
Foreign Minister Baiba Braze of New Unity emphasized the importance of finding an optimal solution for the functioning of anti-corruption institutions in Ukraine[9]. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has promised to propose a new bill on anti-graft agencies to parliament[10]. The solution must ensure the independent functioning, investigation of corruption processes, and transparency of processes in Ukraine[11].
The AFP news agency reported these developments regarding the Ukrainian anti-corruption institutions[12]. Zelensky has expressed gratitude to everyone who stands with Ukraine in relation to the anti-corruption reforms[13]. The EU has welcomed Zelensky's promise to propose a new bill on anti-corruption agencies[14].
Politics and general news have reported on Ukraine's move to reverse controversial legislation regarding the independence of its anti-corruption institutions, taking a significant step towards upholding its commitment to anti-corruption reforms and its EU candidate status, as international scrutiny continues amidst ongoing challenges in the area of asset management and political interference. Policy-and-legislation, particularly regarding asset management and the functioning of anti-corruption institutions, remain key areas of focus in Ukraine's relationship with international partners, such as the European Union, along with the involvement of countries like Latvia and the responses from foreign ministers like Baiba Braze of New Unity.
