Encrypted correspondences linked to CVA unfold intrigue in the Grosjacques affair.
Caught in the Web of Secrets: A Political Maze
The air is thick with whispers, secrets, and unanswered questions. The inquiry begins with a question from Simone Perron, the League councillor, directed towards Renzo Testolin, the regional president: "Who's pulling the strings here?" Testolin responds: "The regional administration has no information different from what the councillor has received with a request under article 116 of the Council's regulations."
The question hangs heavy over the controversial Cva dossier, surrounding a company, cast as a green energy titan, shrouded in mysteries. Perron, during a meeting, refers to the minutes of December 13, 2024, of the Cva board of directors, where a delivery of crucial documents from Cva Eos mayor, Daniele Fassin, to regional assessor, Giulio Grosjacques, is mentioned. However, both parties deny any exchange of documents when interviewed by our website.
Record-breaking Figures Meet Questionable Practices
The affair revolves around a disturbing incident on November 4, 2024, when Chiara Minelli, a PCP councillor, requested clarification over a remuneration package for Eos' managing director, Giuseppe Argiro, and bonuses for the company's administrators. Perron queries: "Is the Cva minutes of December 13 a fabrication?" Testolin evades the question: "Cva will take the necessary actions, as communicated to us on May 30 and June 4 via certified email by president Marco Cantamessa, and they are currently underway, as I assume the other interested parties may also do."
Perron expresses skepticism: "I'm not convinced... The mayor of Eos, a man deeply rooted in the system and with ties to the assessor, has had roles in hydroelectric companies and has worked in others. We need to uncover the intended recipient of the documents mentioned in the Cva minutes and the reason behind their acquisition. If this is a house of cards, as some reports suggest, it seems the cards are weighing like boulders."
Outside the chamber, Perron states: "This issue is political, and the president is burying his head in the sand. Whether there are proofs or not is unclear, but it's written in the minutes. However, the president remains silent." Grosjacques, the assessor, remains silent within the council but, in the lobby, he promises: "In the next session, a PCP motion regarding Cva will be tabled. That will be the place to address all the concerns raised by colleague Perron..." He trails off, intriguingly, with a hint of more to come.
Board of Directors' Secrets
Minelli also questions the selective distribution of candidates for the board of Cva, with the candidates' names being shared exclusively with the 19 majority councillors. In response, Testolin, after reminding that the government will make the final selections following the completion of checks: "It's astounding that, despite being almost at the end of the legislature, the difference between being part of the majority or the opposition has yet to be fully absorbed." Minelli replies: "You represent everyone and, particularly in this case with Cva, where there is an ongoing investigation, it would be appropriate to form an opinion with the Council."
- The controversy surrounding the Cva dossier extends beyond the realm of general news, encompassing policy-and-legislation and politics, as Simone Perron urges for transparency in the regional administration's interactions with Cva Eos mayor, Daniele Fassin, and regional assessor, Giulio Grosjacques.
- The intricate web of secrets spiraling around the Cva dossier has influenced the dynamics of the council, with Perron accusing Testolin of burying his head in the sand and calling for a motion discussing the affair, which will be tabled during the next session, promising more revelations.
