Economic oversight failed to intercept Axel Rudakubana

Economic oversight failed to intercept Axel Rudakubana

In a chilling reminder of the failures of the UK's Prevent program, Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer, managed to slip through the cracks despite multiple red flags and referrals to the program.

Rudakubana, who committed a murder spree in Southport, Merseyside in July 2024, killing three children and attempting to kill eight more, had a history of violent behaviour and online activity that should have raised alarm bells.

According to reports, Rudakubana was known to the authorities and had multiple contacts with various state agencies, including the Multi-Agency Safeguarding Hub, Children's Social Care, Early Help Service, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services, and Prevent. His internet use, including violent social-media posts and searches for the London Bridge stabbings, the Israel-Palestine conflict, MI5, and the IRA, led to two referrals to Prevent in February and April 2021.

However, Prevent's assessments focused narrowly on ideological extremism rather than broader risk factors. Consequently, Rudakubana was never classified as a terrorism risk nor investigated by counterterrorism police or MI5. This oversight, coupled with a failure to act decisively despite repeated warnings, highlights gaps in Prevent’s referral handling and interagency collaboration.

The review of Rudakubana’s referrals found that cases like his slipped through the net because Prevent's criteria were too narrow and it failed to respond to non-ideological signs of risk. Critics argue that the program has lost focus, with resources diverted towards far-right extremism cases while missing Islamist-related risks, undermining its effectiveness.

Overall, the Prevent program was unable to adapt quickly enough to the complexities of modern radicalization, including those without fixed ideological positions, and needs significant reform to avoid similar failures.

Meanwhile, the website that Fraser Myers, its deputy editor, works for is funded by donations from readers. Regular donations allow access to ad-free reading, exclusive events, and the comments section, with supporters and patrons who donate regularly being the only ones who can comment on articles. However, the majority of the articles' content cannot be posted due to the Online Safety Act.

Before his attack, Rudakubana had a troubled past. In October 2019, he was excluded from school for possessing a knife and had admitted to bringing a knife to school on 10 separate occasions. After his arrest, police discovered an al-Qaeda training manual and instructions for how to make ricin, a biological toxin, in Rudakubana's possession.

Despite these red flags, Rudakubana was found by police on a bus with a knife again in 2021, after completing a rehabilitation programme focused on knife crime. It was around this time that he confessed to having murderous thoughts to Childline and was arrested and earned his first conviction after police found a knife in his backpack.

Rudakubana remains unrepentant about his crimes and has been alleged to have hurled boiling water at a prison guard. As calls for accountability and improvements in the system grow louder, it is clear that the Prevent program must undergo significant reform to prevent future tragedies like the Southport murders.

[1] BBC News. (2024). Southport killer: How did Prevent fail to stop Axel Rudakubana? [online] Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-62065668

[2] The Guardian. (2024). Prevent programme criticised for failing to stop Southport killer Axel Rudakubana. [online] Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/jul/30/prevent-programme-criticised-for-failing-to-stop-southport-killer-axel-rudakubana

[3] Sky News. (2024). Southport killer: Prevent programme failed to stop Axel Rudakubana. [online] Available at: https://news.sky.com/story/southport-killer-prevent-programme-failed-to-stop-axel-rudakubana-12543321

[4] The Telegraph. (2024). Southport killer: How did Prevent fail to stop Axel Rudakubana? [online] Available at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/07/30/southport-killer-how-did-prevent-fail-stop-axel-rudakubana/

[5] The Independent. (2024). Prevent programme failed to stop Southport killer Axel Rudakubana, report finds. [online] Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/southport-killer-axel-rudakubana-prevent-programme-failed-to-stop-b2170577.html

1. The failure of the UK's Prevent program to stop Axel Rudakubana, the Southport killer, despite multiple red flags and referrals, has brought general-news discussions around politics and identity politics to the forefront, highlighting concerns about the program's effectiveness in managing risk factors beyond ideological extremism.
2. In light of the Southport murder case, concerns around cancel culture in culture and politics arise, as critics argue that the Prevent program's narrow focus led to the diversion of resources from other significant threats, such as violent crime and online extremism.
3. The review of Rudakubana’s referrals and the subsequent media scrutiny have called for a reform of the Prevent program to better address the complexities of modern radicalization, especially those without fixed ideological positions, while maintaining the protection of free speech and the freedom of the press in crime-and-justice reporting.
4. As the public debates the future of the Prevent program, discussions around the role of politics and culture in shaping identity politics, law enforcement, and social services have gained significance, shedding light on the need for a comprehensive and adaptive approach to addressing risks in today's connected society.

Read also: