Skip to content

District dismisses immigrant removal criticism

County vigorously defends its decision on forced removal of immigrants

Local officials have brushed aside accusations regarding their decision on deportations.
Local officials have brushed aside accusations regarding their decision on deportations.

- District dismisses immigrant removal criticism

In the small town of Göttingen, Germany, a controversial deportation case has been making headlines. The County of Göttingen has initiated the return of a 40-year-old woman, despite claims of identity issues and ongoing legal proceedings.

The woman's asylum application, submitted in 2016, was rejected by the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees in 2018. A court confirmed the rejection in spring 2019. However, the woman's stated country of origin was Burundi, but fingerprint comparisons and embassy information revealed she was from Malawi. Due to the still unresolved identity issue, her deportation was suspended. However, it was carried out despite the ongoing legal proceedings.

The woman's deportation has sparked protests in Göttingen. Around 100 people demonstrated against her deportation on Monday. The demonstration was followed by a paint attack on the immigration office of the County of Göttingen on Wednesday morning, which is suspected to be related to the woman's deportation.

The County of Göttingen has rejected criticism regarding the deportation, stating that they check for possible humanitarian or other residence rights before initiating measures to end residence. The embassy of Malawi issued substitute travel documents for the woman during the deportation process, indicating that she was indeed taken to Malawi, not to the wrong country as some critics claimed.

The Administrative Court of Göttingen and the Higher Administrative Court of Lüneburg both confirmed the legality of the woman's deportation. Despite the controversy, the County of Göttingen is legally obligated to initiate the return of the woman, provided there is no reason for tolerance.

This case highlights the complex nature of deportation processes, particularly when questions of identity and country of origin arise. As the situation unfolds, it is crucial to maintain a focus on factual information and legal proceedings to ensure a fair and just outcome for all parties involved.

1) The ongoing legal controversy surrounding the deportation of a woman from Göttingen, Germany, who was claimed to be from Burundi but later identified as from Malawi, has brought attention to the community's employment policy regarding asylum seekers, as well as general-news politics surrounding immigration issues.

2) The legality of the woman's deportation, despite ongoing identity questions and legal proceedings, has been confirmed by both the Administrative Court of Göttingen and the Higher Administrative Court of Lüneburg, sparking debates within the political sphere about the application of employment policies in such complex cases.

Read also:

    Latest