UFC's Business Model Under Fire: Two Lawsuits Threaten to Uproot MMA Industry
Disorderly legal action disruptsUFC's commercial blueprint
By Mike "The Maverick" Bauer
Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Email Print Copy Link
The MMA world is bracing for a seismic shift, as two explosive lawsuits challenge the Ultimate Fighting Championship's (UFC) business model. These legal battles could drastically alter fighter contracts and reshape the mixed martial arts industry.
UFC fighters have long felt underpaid, accusing the organization of abusing its market dominance. This frustration boiled over into a class action lawsuit that was partially settled for $375 million after a decade-long battle. Now, two more lawsuits muddy the waters, promising turbulent times ahead.
MMA fighters don't hold traditional employment contracts with the UFC, but rather operate as exclusive service providers. The promoter binds them to a term and specific number of fights, with injuries and other factors extending the contract length. In essence, average engagement translates to a fight every six months.
Tapped Out: A Deep Dive into MMA's Compensation Controversies
The latest legal skirmish stems from the judge's concerns about the UFC's alleged monopoly position, as well as contract clauses barring fighters from participating in lawsuits. A new class action lawsuit seeks damages for fighters who can't sue due to such contractual constraints, potentially adding hundreds of millions more in claimed damages.
Meanwhile, veteran fighter Phil Davis has filed a bombastic lawsuit, aiming to prove that the UFC's monopolistic practices cripple his competition. The former UFC fighter argues that other professional MMA event organizers, like the Professional Fighters League (PFL), struggle to attract top-tier talent because of the UFC's long-standing, restrictive contracts. With the UFC firmly holding the reins, Davis contends that other organizations can't offer fights on par with the behemoth promotion.
Davis's lawsuit challenges the UFC's policy of binding top fighters to prolonged contracts. He advocates for a "sunset clause": a contract provision guaranteeing obligations dissipate or become invalid after a specified time frame, effectively allowing premature contract termination. A brief period following the initial UFC antitrust lawsuit saw the UFC incorporating such a clause in its contracts, but the practice was axed soon after.
Breaking Free: The Case of Francis Ngannou
Davis's lawsuit suggests a one-year "sunset clause," which could upend the entire MMA scene. If implemented, numerous UFC fighters could jump ship to other organizations within months, driving up their salaries with each move. This would create a more market-driven pay structure, but at the cost of long-term contractual stability for large organizations. Faced with potential financial losses, the UFC might be compelled to implement the clause itself, sparking a domino effect across the MMA industry.
As the lawsuits navigate their respective legal processes, the stakes for the UFC—and the broader MMA industry—are high. The outcomes could forge new precedents in how MMA promotions govern their relationships with athletes, potentially transforming the power dynamics within the sport.
Sources: ntv.de, mmamania.com, bloodyelbow.com, cagepotato.com
Insights:
- The two lawsuits against the UFC are Phil Davis's antitrust lawsuit, filed in June 2025, and Misha Cirkunov's antitrust lawsuit, filed on May 23, 2025.
- Phil Davis's lawsuit alleges that the UFC's monopoly over MMA suppresses fighter pay by making it difficult for rival promotions to attract top talent.
- If successful, Davis's lawsuit could result in increased competition among promotions, better pay opportunities, and more freedom for fighters.
- Misha Cirkunov's lawsuit focuses on the UFC's use of contract clauses that require individual arbitration and waive the right to participate in class action lawsuits. This lawsuit seeks to dismantle these clauses, enabling affected fighters to join class actions and secure compensation for damages.
- The outcomes of these lawsuits could set new precedents for how MMA promotions structure contracts and treat athletes, potentially transforming the power dynamics within the sport.
- The legal battles surrounding the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) and mixed martial arts (MMA) industry, as demonstrated by Phil Davis's antitrust lawsuit, could reshape sports by fostering increased competition among promotions, leading to better pay opportunities and more freedom for MMA fighters.
- The Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) is at the heart of two significant lawsuits, including Phil Davis's antitrust lawsuit, which positions the sports industry and, specifically, MMA, for a potential transformation in the relationship between promotions and athletes, as well as the power dynamics within the sport.
