"Divided We Stumble" Trump's Peace Pledges Stumble Amidst Inexplicable Conflicts
Disintegration of Trump's Peace Proposals
Social Media Links: Facebook, Twitter, WhatsApp, Email, Print, Copy Link
In the midst of chaos, a self-proclaimed "peacemaker" leads the way. Donald Trump, the U.S. President, continues to make promises of a safer world - yet war persists, especially in the case of Israel and Iran. Even within his MAGA movement, disagreements about the path to achieve this peace run rife.
Last Sunday, Trump confidently declared, "We'll have PEACE, soon, between Israel and Iran." However, his bold words were met with skepticism, as collisions between these two nations show no signs of slowing. Days prior, Israel had been targeting Iran from the air, citing concerns over their alleged nuclear weapons program. Iran retaliated. This conflict, which has intensified under Trump, shows little signs of abating or ending.
Taking office in January, Trump presented himself as a "peacemaker and unifier." His inauguration address promised that the power of the U.S. would "end all wars and bring a new unity to the raging, violent, and chaotic world." However, five months later, few tangible signs of this vision are evident. Despite the grand words, little is accomplished, and peace remains elusive.
The ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran serves as further evidence that Trump's promises often diverge from reality. Only weeks after a meticulously negotiated ceasefire in Gaza ended, Israel resumed military operations, blocking humanitarian aid deliveries for months. In Lebanon, tensions with Hezbollah persist. Europe wrestles with the ramifications of Putin's attack on Ukraine, while the likelihood of a summer offensive looms.
Conflicting Politics
While Trump announced a U.S.-Iran conversation regarding a new nuclear deal, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ignored his pleas not to attack Iran, according to the "Wall Street Journal." In several phone calls the previous week, Trump forbid Netanyahu from initiating hostilities, but to no avail. Unsurprisingly, U.S. embassy and consular staff were soon withdrawn from the region. Iraq's missile strike on Israel's Dimona reactor - an event that transpired just hours after the first wave of Israeli attacks - demonstrated that Trump's calls for restraint had fallen on deaf ears. Only the following morning did Trump acknowledge the new reality, suggesting that further attacks would be "even more brutal."
Trump continues to seek a dialogue with Iran, even going so far as to suggest Russian President Vladimir Putin as a possible mediator. However, as the shaky position of the White House becomes increasingly evident, it begs the question: How much weight should Iran ascribe to Trump's words, if Netanyahu remains determined to do as he pleases and the U.S. maintains a lack of interest in intervention?
Rifts within the MAGA Movement
Conflicting views on Iran are not exclusive to political parties but also within the MAGA movement. Some advocates support military action, while others strive for pacifism, aligning with Trump's sovereigntist approach to avoid entanglement in international commitments. Conservative activist Charlie Kirk mused, "No issue is currently dividing the right as much as foreign policy," as this internal conflict simmers.
On his birthday, President Trump attended a military parade. Vice President JD Vance promised the soldiers, "We will never ask you to go to war unless it is absolutely necessary." Vance, along with others, expressed concerns about the U.S. military strikes in Yemen, which led to a ceasefire, hoping to secure the international trade route through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal.
The Great Divide
When Trump declared, "We'll have PEACE, soon," it seems he may have been unaware of the divergent beliefs within his own followers. While Trump attempts to bring Iran to the negotiating table, it is questionable whether his words truly represent his intentions. With the White House mired in uncertainty, Iran must consider carefully what they should glean from Trump's proclamations.
The United States under the new administration operates under the principle of "peace through strength," relying on military deterrence to avoid foreign conflicts. Yet, they retain the capacity to enforce their interests militarily, should the need arise. Trump and his administration have publicly expressed their desires for the annexation of Greenland and control of the Panama Canal. U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently acknowledged that the Pentagon has "contingency plans" to invade Greenland and Panama.
In the Middle East, Trump had reportedly promised a "sparkling new day" and an end to conflicts during his recent business trip. However, the ongoing turmoil between Israel and Iran, as well as political upheaval in other regions, casts doubt on those promises. With the JCPOA, Iran's nuclear deal with the Obama administration, rejected by Trump, the war in the Middle East rages on, spurred on by Israel's military operations against both Islamic Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, and a new war looms on the horizon.
- The ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran, despite Trump's promises of peace, raises questions about the Community Policy and economic and monetary union (EMU) of the United States, given the potential economic implications of continued war-and-conflicts in the Middle East.
- Internal divisions within the MAGA movement, particularly regarding foreign policy towards Iran, suggest the need for clearer guidelines and leadership within the political landscape (politics), as conflicting views could negatively impact economic and monetary union (EMU) decisions at the national and international level.
