Skip to content

Denying Funds to Adversaries in the Constitution - AfD to Take Action Against This Practice

Denying Finances for Constitution Opponents - AfD Proposes Countermeasures Against Them

State legislature of Rhineland-Palatinate seeks fortification against adversaries of the...
State legislature of Rhineland-Palatinate seeks fortification against adversaries of the constitution. Procedural rules have been strengthened, with primary focus now on financial aspects. (Historical photo) Pictured: Photograph from archives.

Hindering Finances for Constitutional Adversaries - AfD Pursues Action Against Them - Denying Funds to Adversaries in the Constitution - AfD to Take Action Against This Practice

The Alternative for Germany (AfD) is up in arms, vowing to use "all legal means" to challenge the proposed reliability checks on employees of state parliament factions. During a heated first reading of the bill, the parliamentary business manager (PBM) of the AfD faction, Damian Lohr, lashed out against the state parliament president, Hendrik Hering. Lohr accused Hering of orchestrating anti-constitutional machinations and dubbed the proposed bill an "Anti-AfD law" while insisting that the employees of the AfD are "paragons of democracy."

The Rhineland-Palatinate state parliament is treading on new ground with this legislative proposal, introduced by the governing factions and the opposition Christian Democratic Union (CDU). According to the bill, only employees of factions and members of parliament who pass a reliability test will be eligible for future financial remuneration.

The PBM of the Green faction, Carl Bernhard von Heusinger, hopes that other parliaments will follow suit. Lohr, however, contends that the proposal is nothing more than a power grab and ideological test, rather than a security measure. The definitive assessment of reliability will come from the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, a government agency under the control of the Social Democratic Party (SPD)-led Ministry of the Interior.

The PBMs of the SPD and CDU factions, Martin Haller and Markus Klein, dismissed the AfD's claims of victimization. Haller asserted that the law targets extremists across all factions, while Klein added that the AfD could support the law if its employees were indeed "paragons of democracy," as Lohr declared.

Helge Schwab from the Free Voters group raised concerns that those who act against the constitution should be disqualified. Nevertheless, similar to other independent members, Schwab criticized the fact that the final decision on each individual case rests solely with the state parliament president and not with a committee.

Background

Reliability checks or vetting processes are standard practices in many countries, aimed at ensuring individuals in sensitive positions do not pose a security risk. These checks might involve background investigations and are typically aimed at preventing the misuse of sensitive information or positions by individuals with questionable allegiances that could compromise national security or public trust.

Fluctuations in municipal finances and issues with property taxes have been noted as challenges facing Rhineland-Palatinate[4]. However, these issues are unrelated to the proposed reliability checks, which seem to be part of broader governance or security reforms, if they come to pass.

The response of political parties like the AfD could significantly impact public perception and political discourse around such measures, potentially leading to broader debates about security and governance in the region. It remains to be seen how the proposed law and the ensuing controversy will unfold.

The parliamentary business manager (PBM) of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Damian Lohr has threatened legal action against the proposed "Anti-AfD law" in the Rhineland-Palatinate Parliament, as the bill calls for reliability checks on employees of state parliament factions, a practice common in European EC countries with the aim of preventing individuals with questionable allegiances from compromising national security or public trust. This legislation, currently under debate, is administered by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution, a government agency under the control of the Social Democratic Party (SPD)-led Ministry of the Interior. Additionally, disputes over this bill could have far-reaching implications, potentially influencing politics, policy-and-legislation, and general-news discussions, not only within the Rhineland-Palatinate region but also among other EC countries, as they grapple with similar issues like war-and-conflicts and governing reforms.

Read also:

Latest