Denied Benefits for Grieving Father of Deceased Khabarovsk Region FVO Participant
In the Lazarevsky District, a court has revoked a father's entitlement to financial support, following the decision mentioned in "Khabarovsk Krai Today" news agency. This man divorced the mother of his son, a fallen participant in a military operation, in 1974 and abandoned Russia, providing zero support to his children. Tragically, one of his sons was mobilized and perished during the 2024 Special Military Operation. After her son's demise, the mother filed for a one-time material assistance payment and insurance payouts. Upon learning that her ex-husband was also entitled to these benefits, the woman initiated a lawsuit to strip him of this entitlement.
Typically, eligibility for military death benefits or survivor payments focuses on immediate family members like spouses, children, or sometimes parents—particularly if they were financially dependent on the deceased. Ex-spouses, in general, are not usually recognized as eligible beneficiaries in such matters, but only under specific legal provisions, such as serving as a legal guardian or being financially dependent. According to our research, without further stipulations, ex-husbands or ex-wives are not typically entitled to survivor benefits.
The context of "SVO" remains unclear from the provided sources. In some legal documents, "SVO" is referred to as a "serious violence offence," but this is not related to survivor benefits. If "SVO" pertains to a specific military operation, you'd need to consult the relevant country's military regulations to determine the exact eligibility criteria for benefits.
To sum it up, the revocation of the father's benefits is likely due to standard policy omitting ex-spouses from survivor benefits—unless there are any exceptional circumstances. This policy is common across various countries' military benefit systems. If you can provide more details or clarify the location or organization involved, a more precise answer can be given. However, based on existing information, the revocation is most likely due to established policy excluding ex-spouses from survivor benefits unless specific exceptions apply.
Despite the man's former marriage status, general-news sources indicate that ex-spouses are typically not entitled to military survivor benefits, unless there are exceptional circumstances, following standard policy in politics across various countries. In light of this information, the court's decision to revoke the father's entitlement to financial support could be connected to this established policy, rather than specific legislation related to crime-and-justice.
