Skip to content

Democrats pursue details on Trump administration's withdrawals of security clearances

"Multiple rejections point to significant issues with the government's vetting procedures or indicate that the process has been tainted by politics, according to legislators."

Democrats pursuing details on Trump administration's rescissions of security clearances
Democrats pursuing details on Trump administration's rescissions of security clearances

Democrats pursue details on Trump administration's withdrawals of security clearances

In a surprising move, the Trump administration has revoked the social security clearances of 37 current and former national security officials. The decision, made by an official authority, has raised concerns among lawmakers, who are questioning the reasons behind the revocations and the potential impact on national security.

Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, has accused the singled-out officials of politicizing or weaponizing intelligence, failing to safeguard classified information, and failing to adhere to professional analytic tradecraft standards, among other unspecified 'detrimental' conduct. However, her memo did not provide evidence to support these accusations.

A letter seeking responses was sent by U.S. Rep. Jim Himes of Connecticut, the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, and 11 other Democratic lawmakers serving on the panel. The lawmakers asked whether standard social security clearance review procedures were followed in these revocations, whether the government notified those affected before the revocations were announced, and whether the Trump administration considered the impact the revocations would have on national security.

The spokesperson for the relevant government agency confirmed that all agencies were notified about the social security clearance revocations. The Democrats expressed concern that the large number of revocations either reflects deep problems with government vetting or suggests the process has become politicized.

Gabbard justified the revocations by saying the 37 current and former officials all either tried to politicize their work or failed to meet some other professional standard. The lawmakers sent a letter to Gabbard asking for the specific reasons for each social security clearance revocation. The search results do not specify who exactly made this decision.

This development comes at a time when tensions are high regarding the handling of sensitive information and the politicization of intelligence within the administration. As the situation unfolds, the public and lawmakers will be closely watching for more information and clarification on the reasons behind these social security clearance revocations.

Read also:

Latest