Skip to content

Democrats' Digital Fundraising Operations Under Attack by Trump

Democrats face financial scrutiny from Trump

© Image by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images depicting controversial political scene
© Image by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images depicting controversial political scene

Democrats' Digital Fundraising Operations Under Attack by Trump

Rewritten Article:

Let's get this straight: President Trump's aiming to investigate ActBlue, the main fundraising engine for Democrats' political campaigns. In a move that dropped on Thursday, the White House rolled out an executive order, and it's got ActBlue in its crosshairs.

Here's the lowdown. The executive order claims foreign nationals could be funding American elections via fundraising platforms like ActBlue, all while hiding behind the scenes. The order gives Attorney General Pam Bondi and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant the green light to dig up dirt on such sites, looking for signs of fishy business. The order stresses:

...existential mud has spewed about online fundraising platforms helping out with illegal contribution schemes to political candidates and committees.

The order continues:

What's more, these reports get folks all riled up about mischief-makers using ActBlue—and similar platforms—to dodge federal rules by splitting donations from a single source into smaller chunks, allocating them to multiple contributors, possibly without their knowledge. Add to that the concern that these beneficial dosh's being channeled through phony accounts, potentially via gift cards or pre-paid credit cards, to slip under the radar.

Bondi and Bessant are now authorized to bust a move, using "all lawful methods" to sniff out ActBlue's vulnerability to foreign meddling. Gizmodo reached out to the White House for a nitty-gritty about the investigation, but they were like, "Nope, not telling."

This executive order mentions a prior investigation by House Republican peeps into ActBlue. They claim they've got proof of foreign-born fraud on ActBlue to back their stance.

Now, it's worth noting that Republicans don't lag behind in the fundraising department. They've got their own turf,WinRed, launched in Trump's first term. It's a for-profit fundraising tool introduced to tighten the screws on Democrats' dominant ActBlue. Despite not being as successful as its democratic counterpart, WinRed's often been slammed by Republicans themselves, with the platform being called into question by several state attorneys general for the shady tactics it uses to rally donations.

Insights:

Background

ActBlue is a prominent online fundraising platform, usually used by the Democratic Party. It's been key in gathering funds for numerous Democratic campaigns and committees. But recent probes and media reports have cast shadows on its role in potentially allowing foreign interference in US elections. Federal law plainly forbids making political contributions on someone else’s behalf or contributions from foreign nationals (52 U.S.C. 30121 and 30122)[1].

Details of the Investigation

  • Reports of Fraud: Investigations by congressional committees have indicated significant fraud cases on ActBlue, including “straw donations” made via phoney accounts using pre-paid cards or gift cards to skate under the radar. A noteworthy example is the detection of 237 donations from foreign IP addresses using pre-paid cards during a 30-day period in the 2024 election cycle[1][2].
  • Response from ActBlue: Despite these findings, ActBlue has faced criticism for its lax approach to fraud prevention. Internal communications have revealed attempts to camouflage fraud-related policy changes, which were made less stringent despite evidence of ongoing fraud[3].

Implications

  • Legal and Regulatory Implications: The investigation could lead to legal actions against ActBlue and other platforms involved in similar schemes. It might also trigger legislative changes to toughen regulations on online political fundraising.
  • Political Impact: The investigation and potential outcomes could significantly affect public trust in the electoral process and fundraising practices within the Democratic Party. It could also influence future campaigns and fundraising techniques.
  • International Implications: If foreign influence is confirmed, it could escalate diplomatic tensions and trigger global discussions on election tampering. It may also instigate enhanced vigilance for foreign contributions in elections worldwide.

Bottom line: the investigation of ActBlue brings to light the ongoing challenges in upholding the integrity of American elections and the requirement for bold steps to prevent external influence.

  1. Gizmodo reports on the controversy surrounding President Trump's intent to investigate ActBlue, a primary Democratic fundraising platform, as stated in a recent executive order.
  2. The executive order alleges foreign nationals may be funding American elections through platforms like ActBlue, stirring concerns about foreign interference in US politics and policy-and-legislation.
  3. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant have been given authorization to investigate for signs of illicit activity on ActBlue, according to the order.
  4. Some reports suggest ActBlue's vulnerability to foreign meddling could be exploited by mischief-makers who evade federal rules by using the platform to break down large donations into smaller ones, possibly without the knowledge of the original donor.
  5. Despite being accused of fraud by congressional committees, Republicans also run their own for-profit fundraising tool, WinRed, which has faced criticism for questionable fundraising tactics.
  6. The ongoing investigation of ActBlue highlights the importance of enacting policies to maintain the technology of online fundraising's integrity in the future of tech and politics, in the realm of general-news.

Read also:

Latest