Delays and Removals in Epstein Files

Demise of the Epstein Files: A Rigged Expose or the Deep State's Ace Up Its Sleeve?

Daily Brief News | Jack Johnson | Daily-Brief.com

ai_avenger | twitter.com/inside_the_loop

I find myself compelled to put pen to paper, or fingers to keyboard, to express my mounting exasperation regarding the Epstein Files™ frenzy. It baffles me why anyone sane enough to question their purpose would consider the imminent unfolding of the documents as anything other than a marketing gimmick meant to fool the masses that the swamp is being drained. The Trump administration, while markedly ditching the depths of corruption that plagued its first term, continues to be the exception to every rule, with the state of Israel still acting as the loyalty test. Constant whispers of Jeffrey Epstein's apparent ties to Israeli intelligence feed worries about how this revelation will unfold.

These concerns have every cause to be heightened after the claims of a whistleblower suggesting that members of the FBI are destroying evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein, set for release. The whistleblower, going by the name Garret O'Boyle, has mentioned to veteran journalist Michael Shellenberger that evidence from FBI servers regarding the late financier has been dumped.

As per a source known to O'Boyle, FBI employees have been eliminating sensitive files pertaining to Epstein since long before Kash Patel took over as director of the bureau. O'Boyle asserts that the deletion of the files is irreversible due to the specific technical infrastructure housing the data.

Patel's confirmation as FBI Director was met with cheers as a key turning point in the fight against the deep state. However, less than a week later, the Hoover building still stands, and the most insidious FBI members remain active, engaging in questionable activities like deleting critical Epstein files. The delay in releasing the files under the watch of Attorney General Pam Bondi has fueled speculation that the impending disclosure might be no more than a whitewash to protect prominent figures for political gain.

The anger over the handling of the Epstein Files™ has grown more vocal. When the release date was announced on Friday, February 21st, excitement turned to skepticism in just four short days as Bondi faces increasing criticism for the delay in disclosure, stoking feelings that the revelation might be little more than a smokescreen to shield key players.

The paradoxical nature of the delay aligns with the Trump administration's rhetoric around placing America First and ripping the mask off the deep state, yet seems to have mysteriously transported the nation into an alternate reality where Democratic Representative Ilhan Omar starts to resemble the voice of reason.

Anna Paulina Luna, the newly appointed Republican House Representative of Florida's 13th Congressional District and the leader of a task force tasked with scrutinizing the release of secretive documents declassified by the Trump administration, has joined critics in venting her frustration over the handling of the document disclosure process. According to Luna, she has faced no response after making several attempts to contact officials within the Department of Justice under Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Luna, voicing her agitation, also addressed the claims about Epstein evidence being deleted, confirmed by Shellenberger. Luna confirmed that she aims to engage with the whistleblower to discuss the allegations. Although the FBI employees responsible for the file deletion have yet to be identified, Luna aims to bring them to justice under applicable charges, including treason.

While the task force Luna is leading does not possess the power to declassify documents, its purpose is intended to speed up the process for the DOJ, DNI, and other high-ranking officials within the Trump administration. With the whistleblower confirming to Shellenberger that the deletion of the files has been ongoing since the task force was established, their efforts to checkmate deep state maneuvers appear toothless as of now.

The central mystery that everyone seems to be avoiding amidst all the furor concerns what documents are at stake and why. The debate naturally centers on Epstein's relationship with the intelligence community, a connection that was confirmed by former Trump administration Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta. Acosta, during his 2017 interview, stated that he was told to let the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein slide to avoid federal charges when he was the US Attorney for Florida. The agreement allowed Epstein to serve a mere 13 months in jail for charges related to sexual assault of minors.

The resurfacing controversy surrounding Acosta's role in the Epstein agreement ultimately resulted in his resignation from his position. However, Epstein had ties to many other high-ranking officials, including former Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross and Apollo Global Management CEO Leon Black. The complex web woven by the Epstein network transcends political lines, with many prominent figures from both parties linked to him.

One cannot help but wonder if the events unfolding around the Epstein Files™ will expose the intricate machinations of the deep state or serve only to protect those who are already ensconced within its grip. As the clock ticks on, we can only hope that justice remains the ultimate goal.

The ongoing debates within the community regarding the Epstein Files™ reveal concerns about whether the delayed release of these documents is a whitewash to protect powerful figures for political gain, or if it will expose the deep-rooted connections between prominent individuals and the intelligence community.
As members of the FBI are allegedly deleting evidence related to Jeffrey Epstein, regardless of the confirmation of Kash Patel as FBI Director, the general-news landscape is filled with crime-and-justice narratives, raising questions about the truth behind the Epstein Files™ and the possible involvement of treasonous activities within the bureau.