Deep State Exposure: Unveiling the Truth Behind CERCLE and Kyklos Circle's Inner Sanctum
Revealing Remarks by Former UK Advisor Dominic Cummings Shed Light on 'Deep State' Influence
In a series of generous disclosures, Dominic Cummings, a previous chief advisor to former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, has offered insights into the workings of the British government and the alleged influence of the so-called 'deep state.'
One prominent definition of the 'deep state' comes from US defense analyst-cum-writer Mike Lofgren, who in his 2014 essay "Anatomy of the Deep State" described it as a secretive network of powerful individuals and interests within government that persistently work to shape policy and influence decisions, often outside the bounds of formal democratic processes.
Delving into Cummings' December 2024 remarks—with names updated to reflect the current cast of characters—reveals intriguing questions about the fundamental nature of power and governance in the UK:
Ailsa Terry of the BBC contends that David Lammy, a prominent politician, may merely serve as window dressing, leaving unaddressed the larger issue of who—if not elected bureaucrats—is actually running the show. Furthermore, she poses several questions: Why participate in the political charade at all if the decisions are being made behind closed doors by unelected entities? Who do these bureaucrats serve? And how can the headed-off-at-the-pass power of these decision-makers be challenged if they are not the politicians we voted for to represent us?
Cummings' 2024 comments were not his first politically uncomfortable disclosures. In a 2021 Parliamentary Committee hearing, he admitted that powerful globalist figures, including Bill Gates, were affecting the UK's emergency response to the Covid-19 pandemic. In essence, he claimed that the public perception of government was a facade, created to maintain faith in a flawed political system.
Unsurprisingly, the BBC took it upon itself to fact-check Cummings' claims, focusing on the notion that politicians were solely responsible for the decision-making process. However, they failed to delve into Cummings' revelation about the influence of a globalist network on government policy. Sky News, for its part, neglected to report the substance of Cummings' statements while attempting to cast the globalist oligarchs in a positive light.
Liz Truss, a short-tenured prime minister, has also weighed in on the issue, confessing that she found that the levers of power were not in the hands of the prime minister or the chancellor but rather in the hands of the Bank of England and the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR). The Bank of England, as a privately-owned institution, operates independently of the UK government, and the OBR – a public-private partnership – shapes fiscal policy without necessarily reflecting the will of the elected government.
The OBR claims to merely monitor government fiscal policy, but its advisory panel – consisting of representatives from major financial institutions and think tanks – is involved in formulating forecasts that ultimately influence government decision-making. Essentially, policy does not always reflect the will of the people, pointing to the façade-like nature of governing institutions.
These revelations should prompt us to question the meaning and sanctity of our electoral process. The entire legacy media network has, for decades if not centuries, cultivated the illusion that the system is meaningful and worth engaging in. People tend to abdicate their skepticism and allow those in power to carry on with their agenda unfettered.
Stateside, mainstream and alternative media serve the whims of the powerful by propagandizing on their behalf and downplaying or dismissing inconvenient truths as baseless conspiracy theories. By doing so, they maintain the public's trust in the political establishment and discourage widespread questioning.
In conclusion, the disclosures made by Dominic Cummings and Liz Truss lend credence to the existence of what many call the 'deep state'. In order to challenge the power of these unelected entities that, it appears, truly wield the reins of government, ordinary citizens must exercise their own authority and engage in meaningful distributive action. It is increasingly clear that government is nothing more than a sophisticated mechanism for controlling the populace and serving the interests of the elite.
Footnotes:
- Wikipedia contributors. (2021, July 17). Self-censorship. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. Retrieved 10:53, March 11, 2025, from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Self-censorship&oldid=1031131943
- Gallup. (2021, June 15). Trust in Media Holds Steady, But Still Stuck in Long-Term Doldrums. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/347485/trust-media-holds-steady-long-term-doldrums.aspx
- Lofgren, M. (2014). Anatomy of the Deep State. TomDispatch. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175943/the_anatomy_of_the_deep_state/#
- Kit Knightly. (2024, August 21). How all-encompassing is the deep state? Off-Guardian. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://off-guardian.org/2024/08/21/how-all-encompassing-is-the-deep-state/
- The revelations by Dominic Cummings and Liz Truss underscore the need for alternative media sources to report on the 'deep state', as mainstream outlets may propagate the whims of the powerful and minimize inconvenient truths.
- The influential 'deep state' network, often working beyond formal democratic processes, requires citizens to question the validity of solutions proposed by government officials, particularly in areas like science, politics, and general-news.
- As the public seeks for freedom from this apparent manipulation, it becomes crucial to scrutinize the truth behind the decisions made in the name of the people, evaluating them against the general interests of the public and not just the elite.
