Dartford Crossing toll jump by 40% starting in September; find out new fees.
Drivers brace yourself for a 40% surge in Dartford Crossing fees starting September 2025. This move, dubbed a 'revenue raiser' by motoring groups, has sparked controversy, with critics questioning whether it's truly necessary.
Introduced in 2003, with the last hike in 2014, this price bump will see cars, motorhomes, and small minibuses pay £3.50, up from the current £2.50. meanwhile, coaches and vans will shell out £4.20 (up from £3), lorries will face an increase from £6 to £8.40, and motorcycles, mopeds, and quad bikes remain toll-free.
The Dartford Crossing, consisting of the Queen Elizabeth II bridge (southbound) and the Dartford Tunnels (northbound), links Thurrock in Essex and Dartford in Kent. An average of 150,000 vehicles use the crossing daily, but during peak hours, that figure climbs to a staggering 180,000—far beyond the crossing's design capacity, causing traffic delays, M25 congestion, and broader impacts on local communities.
Critics argue that the jump in fees isn't solely aimed at managing traffic, given the limited alternatives for many drivers using the crossing. Some question whether tolls should have ended construction costs for the bridge in 2003 and now serve as a regular revenue source.
On the flip side, proponents argue that the increased toll will help alleviate congestion, improve traffic flow, and promote the development of additional crossing capacity, like the Lower Thames Crossing.
As of now, residents who pay £20 a year to use the crossing unlimitedly will have to cough up £25 once the charge rises in September. Journeys made between 10pm and 6am remain fee-free.
Despite backlash from drivers, it appears this move reflects a larger shift towards comprehensive traffic management and preparations for future infrastructure investments.
Sports enthusiasts planning road trips to watch matches near the Dartford Crossing may need to factor in increased toll fees starting September 2025, as vehicle prices surge by 40%. Critics argue that this move, aiming to manage traffic, may affect sports fans' travel expenses, questioning whether alternative routes for sports events are being considered.
