Skip to content

Customs authorities granted Fitosanitary certifications

Judgment issued in Smolensk region case: Former officials and associates of the Federal Agency for State Control, Veterinary and Phytosanitary Surveillance indicted for accepting bribes. Exporters paid off these officials to secure phytosanitary certificates, reaping illegal gains totaling over...

Customs authorities have distributed Fitosanitary certificates for tax clearance
Customs authorities have distributed Fitosanitary certificates for tax clearance

Customs authorities granted Fitosanitary certifications

In a case that highlights the complexities of Russia's political and legal landscape, Yuliy Ivanov, a high-ranking official, has managed to evade criminal charges related to a corruption scheme. The case, which involved the issuance of phytosanitary certificates for the export of quarantine products, unfolded in the Primorye region.

The Frunzensky District Court of Vladivostok found five individuals guilty of receiving bribes under Part 5, 6 of Article 290 of the RF Criminal Code. Among the guilty parties was a criminal group that facilitated the issuance of these certificates for the export of timber and grain. The Primorye prosecutor's office reported the activities of this group, but specific details about Yuliy Ivanov's involvement were not provided in the given paragraph.

Yuliy Ivanov, the main defendant, was appointed acting head of the Rosselkhoznadzor management for the Primorsky Krai and Sakhalin Oblast in June 2015. Prior to his appointment, he held the position of director of a fish processing plant in the holding company "System Solutions." Two of the defendants were former employees of the Rosselkhoznadzor office in Ussuriysk.

However, Yuliy Ivanov did not receive an accusatory verdict in this criminal case. Instead, he was released from criminal responsibility after signing a contract to participate in a special military operation and receiving a state award at the front. This legal measure, which exempts individuals participating in such operations from criminal liability and punishment if they were not yet convicted at the time of participation, effectively created a shield against prosecution for some officials or individuals engaged in such operations.

Two other suspects in the case have evaded investigation and are wanted. The five defendants received sentences ranging from eight years and four months to nine years in a strict regime colony. They are also required to pay a fine of 2.4 million to 45 million rubles.

It is a recognized pattern in Russia for high-ranking officials or influential persons to evade criminal prosecution through participation in state-endorsed operations or by holding protected statuses, supported by recent laws and the political-legal environment that heavily favors the Kremlin-aligned elite. This case serves as a stark reminder of the challenges in holding powerful figures accountable for their actions.

Despite the controversy surrounding his case, Yuliy Ivanov maintained that his duties should be carried out in a way that benefits honest entrepreneurs and protects the country's natural resources. In an interview, he stated, "We must carry out our duties in such a way that honest entrepreneurs can work comfortably, and consumers and the country's natural resources do not suffer."

As international efforts such as the Special Tribunal for crimes related to the aggression against Ukraine continue to prosecute individuals responsible for serious international crimes, the case of Yuliy Ivanov underscores the need for continued scrutiny and reform within Russia's political and legal systems.

  1. The case involving Yuliy Ivanov, despite his high-ranking position in politics, has highlighted the complexities of Russia's general-news landscape, as he evaded criminal charges linked to a corruption scheme in the crime-and-justice sector.
  2. Amidst allegations of evading criminal prosecution, Yuliy Ivanov, a former high-ranking official, defended his duties in the politics sphere, stating that they should be carried out to benefit honest entrepreneurs and protect the country's natural resources, thus remaining a subject of interest in the realm of general-news and crime-and-justice.

Read also:

    Latest