Skip to content

Crystal Palace Exploring Potential Legal Actions Following Unsuccessful Europa League Appeal

Crystal Palace suffered relegation to the Conference League due to a violation of rules regarding multiple club ownership, despite clinching the FA Cup victory

Evaluating potential lawsuits in response to the defeated Europa League appeal by Crystal Palace
Evaluating potential lawsuits in response to the defeated Europa League appeal by Crystal Palace

Crystal Palace Faces Demotion and Financial Loss after UEFA Multi-Club Ownership Breach

Crystal Palace's Europa League qualification for the 2025–26 season has taken a dramatic turn, with the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) upholding a ban on the club and demoting them to the UEFA Conference League. This decision stems from a violation of UEFA’s multi-club ownership (MCO) rules due to shared control by John Textor over both Crystal Palace and French club Lyon, both of which qualified for the same competition.

Implications of the Ban

The demotion to the Conference League means that instead of participating in the Europa League, Crystal Palace will compete in the lower-tier competition for the 2025–26 season. As a direct result, Nottingham Forest, who finished seventh in the Premier League, have been awarded Palace’s Europa League place.

The ban has significant implications for Palace, including reputational and competitive impact. Palace's supporters face disappointment as the club misses out on higher-level continental competition despite winning the FA Cup that season. The financial and sporting consequences are also substantial, as Europa League participation generally brings more revenue, stronger opponents, and greater exposure than the Conference League.

The CAS ruling affirms that UEFA’s MCO rules are strictly enforced, with no flexibility for clubs that fail to comply by the assessment date (March 1, 2025). Despite John Textor selling his 43% stake in Palace before UEFA’s ruling, the timing was too late, and the decisive influence at the assessment date was determinant.

Since Lyon finished higher in their domestic league than Palace and also qualified for Europe, UEFA regulations mandate that only one of the clubs controlled by the same party may enter the same UEFA competition. Lyon’s higher league placement gave them priority over Palace despite Palace having won the FA Cup.

Future Compliance and Legal Action

Crystal Palace will need to ensure ownership and influence structures comply fully with UEFA rules to avoid similar sanctions in the future. The club has already taken their case to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) regarding the breach of UEFA's multi-club ownership rules. Palace are resigned to their Conference League fate on the pitch but plan to explore the possibility of seeking significant damages.

Upcoming Fixtures

On the pitch, Crystal Palace's Premier League season begins with a visit to Chelsea on August 17. Their first Conference League play-off first leg is also scheduled for August 17. The first Premier League meeting of the new season between Palace and Forest is expected to be a 'feisty affair', with Forest's intervention with UEFA further straining relations between the two clubs.

[1] UEFA.com [2] BBC Sport [3] The Guardian [4] Sky Sports

Read also:

Latest