Covert Operations for Merz: Israel Destroys AfD (in covert operations)
Byline: Hendrik Wieduwilt
The world watches as Israel makes its bold move against Iran's nuclear weapons program. The debate rages on in Germany, with some finding international law irrelevant, while others cite it as a beacon of hope.
The Internet's Take on International Law
The Reichelt doctrine, a term gaining traction, suggests international law is worthless, just a piece of paper. But many commentators are quick to dispute this view. They wave international law like a banner, citing Israel's actions as a clear violation. Professor Kai Ambos insists Israel's actions are a classic case of a prohibited preventive strike, while his colleague Matthias Goldmann echoes similar sentiments.[Enrichment Data]
A Way to Vent for the Common Man
In times of international crisis, the German public seeks solace in venting about foreign policy matters. International law becomes a popular outlet, and even the zealous German atom anxieties seem to fade away. "Let Israel wait a bit longer until an 'attack' is present according to legal standards," some say casually.[Enrichment Data]
The discussion on international law unfolds like a civil dispute over a neighbor's trees. However, the reality is far more complex. The Aholeka (comparable to international law) is a political tool, more abstract than Germany’s civil code (BGB). While some voices can justify Israel's actions, they are largely in the minority, especially in Europe.[Enrichment Data]
A Potential War Casualty: AfD's Inner Divisions
As Israel strikes Iran, another casualty is the German AfD, or Alternative for Germany. The party, known for its polarizing views, finds itself divided over Israel and the Middle East issue. The Hawks in the blue camp, who advocate for diplomacy with Russia, may soon find themselves sharing a bed with Iran's Ali Khamenei, as boundaries blur.[Enrichment Data]
Former AfD party leader Tino Chrupalla had initially condemned the Hamas attack but called for diplomacy, a stance criticized by some hardliners within the party.[Enrichment Data]
Meanwhile, the AfD's leader, Beatrix von Storch, voiced her opposition to a nuclear-armed Islamic world on Nius.[Enrichment Data]
This internal struggle within the AfD highlights the evolving nature of their stance towards Israel and the Middle East conflict, echoing broader fractures within the party.[Enrichment Data]
From Israel's "dirty work" to the ever-divided AfD, the world watches as the Middle East unfolds a web of politics and international law.
[1]Further Reading: ntv.de, "Israel," "Iran," "Nuclear weapons"
[Enrichment Data]: The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party shows a significant division and evolving stance regarding Israel and the Iran nuclear issue, which mirrors broader fractures within the party. AfD's stance towards Israel: [Details provided earlier] AfD's stance towards the Iran nuclear issue: After Israeli strikes against Iran in June 2025, AfD foreign policy spokesperson Markus Frohnmaier called for a diplomatic solution and cessation of hostilities, while firmly opposing Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons.[1] Impact of these stances on the AfD: The party is divided between a faction that supports Israel firmly and another that criticizes German backing of Israel in the Gaza conflict. This division is evident in contrasting views between co-leaders and other MPs.[1] In summary, the AfD today is internally split on Israel, with prominent leaders advocating conflicting approaches, ranging from continued support for Israel’s security to calls for ending what is seen as one-sided German backing. On Iran, the party favors diplomatic engagement but opposes Iran obtaining nuclear weapons.[1]
- The AfD's stance towards Israel, as exemplified by their internal division, is a reflection of broader fractures within the party, as some leaders support Israel firmly while others criticize German backing in conflicts like the Gaza conflict.
- In the ongoing discussion of Israel's actions and the Iran nuclear issue, the AfD's foreign policy spokesperson, Markus Frohnmaier, has called for a diplomatic solution and cessation of hostilities, but is strongly against Iran pursuing nuclear weapons.
){kind=link}