Skip to content
Sports betting — Crime-and-justice

Court upholds temporary reinstatement of Trump's tariffs following nullification of prior ban

Trump's unilateral tariff imposition authority contested and ruled against by federal court, significantly undermining his key tactic in trade war.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
Trade war tactics of President Trump face a significant challenge as a federal court rules against...
Trade war tactics of President Trump face a significant challenge as a federal court rules against his unilateral power to impose tariffs, potentially limiting this key strategy in his ongoing trade conflicts.

Court upholds temporary reinstatement of Trump's tariffs following nullification of prior ban

In a fresh twist, a federal appeals court has temporarily reinstated President Donald Trump's tariffs following a lower court order blocking them, potentially prolonging the ongoing dispute.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit suspended the initial decision, offering a temporary reprieve for the tariffs while it considers Trump's appeal.

Earlier Thursday, the administration requested the New York-based Court of International Trade to postpone its order, warning that an immediate enforcement could spell disaster for U.S. foreign policy.

Recently, a three-judge panel struck down Trump's global tariffs, labeling them "unlawful." The judges argued that the Internal Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) doesn't grant Trump the unlimited authority to impose tariffs. They also stated that Congress, not the president, holds the power to impose tariffs in most cases, and that Trump's tariffs do not meet the criteria of an "unusual and extraordinary threat."

Unsurprisingly, Trump took to his social media platform to express his displeasure with the judges' decision. He questioned the origins of the panel and suggested a personal vendetta against him as the possible motivation behind the ruling.

A second federal court also weighed in, deeming the tariffs "unlawful." The decision restricted only the Trump administration's ability to collect tariffs from the two companies that initiated the lawsuit—Learning Resources, Inc., and hand2mind, Inc. The Department of Justice, in turn, petitioned for a stay to Wednesday's ruling, citing immediate and irreparable harm to U.S. foreign policy and national security.

The administration argued that the court order would strip the president of leverage in trade negotiations, jeopardize already-reached trade deals, and leave the country vulnerable to countries eager to exploit the situation. In response, the White House spokesperson, Kush Desai, pointed out the trade deficit and affirmed the administration's commitment to addressing this "crisis."

Since Trump declared sweeping tariffs on more than 50 countries in April, the administration has faced numerous legal challenges contesting the president's ability to impose tariffs without congressional approval. Disputes persist as the case now moves to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. The court may decide to prolong the stay or rule in favor of the tariff's removal when it fully reviews the appeal.

Notably, one of the judges on the panel that rendered the initial ruling, Judge Timothy Reif, was nominated by Trump. The case represents the first instance of a federal court evaluating the legality of Trump's tariffs, adding another milestone to the contentious saga.

Sources:1. ABC News, "Federal Appeals Court Temporarily Reinstates Trump's Tariffs," May 29, 2025.2. CNN, "Court Temporarily Blocks Judge's Order to Lift Trump's Tariffs," May 28, 2025.3. CNBC, "Judge Says Trump's Tariffs Invalid under International Economic Emergency Powers Act," May 27, 2025.4. Politico, "Department of Justice Seeks Stay as Appeals Court Considers Trump Tariffs," May 28, 2025.

In-depth analysis:- The Department of Justice has requested a stay to the Court of International Trade's decision, suggesting that an immediate lifting of the tariffs could harm U.S. foreign policy, national security, and trade negotiations.- The decision, if upheld, would mark the first time a federal court has enforced a ruling against Trump's tariffs.- This latest development in the ongoing tariff controversy highlights the fine line between executive and legislative powers regarding tariffs and economic policy.

  1. The reinstatement of President Trump's tariffs by a federal appeals court raises questions about the president's authority to impose tariffs without congressional approval, escalating the ongoing dispute.
  2. In the realm of general news, this revival of Trump's tariffs could have significant implications for international economic policy and trade relations.
  3. The justice system's evaluation of the legality of Trump's tariffs, as evidenced by the recent federal appeals court decision, underscores the importance of judicial review in maintaining checks and balances.
  4. Interestingly, the initial ruling against Trump's tariffs was made by a three-judge panel, one of whom was nominated by Trump himself, adding an intriguing layer to the saga.
  5. Economic policy and legislation, including the Internal Emergency Economic Powers Act, are under scrutiny as the case progresses, shedding light on the delicate balance of powers in government.
  6. The administration's argument that lifting the tariffs would leave the country vulnerable and jeopardize trade deals points to the potential economic consequences of such a decision.
  7. Alongside political debates, the ongoing tariff controversy has also sparked discussions about business, as many companies and industries are directly affected by these measures.
  8. Beyond the tariff issue, the administration's handling of various policies and controversies, such as trade deficits and war-and-conflicts, has been a topic of widespread opinion and speculation in sports-betting spheres, underscoring the intersection of politics and general news in shaping public discourse.

Read also:

Related

Latest