Skip to content

Court Rules Commission Breached obligations under Article 85 (1) of the Treaty.

Compulsory redistribution, seemingly aimed at protection, is actually revealed to be reckless and careless, according to Elke Simon-Kuch (Photo), a member of the CDU parliamentary group's working group on science, energy, climate protection, and environment in the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament.

Upon thorough examination, what was initially perceived as a unified initiative, is revealed as...
Upon thorough examination, what was initially perceived as a unified initiative, is revealed as blind distribution without consideration for proportionality, according to Elke Simon-Kuch (photo), a member of the working group on Science, Energy, Climate Protection, and Environment within the CDU faction in the Saxony-Anhalt state parliament.

Court Rules Commission Breached obligations under Article 85 (1) of the Treaty.

In the world of German politics, a member of the CDU faction in Saxony-Anhalt's state parliament, Elke Simon-Kuch, has raised eyebrows with her critique of mandatory insurance for elementary damages. Upon closer scrutiny, this supposed safety net seems to be less of a protection measure and more like a blanket redistribution of risk.

Simon-Kuch argues that the mandatory insurance punishes those who have already taken precautions and shifted individual risks onto the broader public. The questions surrounding practical implementation are numerous, such as what happens to those who cannot or do not wish to purchase insurance, or those struggling in high-risk areas with unaffordable premiums.

The CDU faction is particularly opposed to the proposed risk assessment system, ZÜRS, due to its perceived opacity and biases against rural areas. Instead, they advocate for a focus on strengthening personal responsibility, education, and targeted preventative measures. In Simon-Kuch's opinion, everyone should have the freedom to protect themselves against such damages without compulsion.

Although the controversy surrounding mandatory elementary damages insurance and Elke Simon-Kuch specifically is not widely reported in the international media, typical criticisms of similar requirements in Germany tend to revolve around issues such as cost burden, equity, governmental overreach, and effectiveness. Specifically, the CDU often voices concerns about excessive state regulation, financial burdens on citizens, and the merits of market-driven solutions over mandatory state measures.

  1. The debate over mandatory elementary damages insurance in German politics, as raised by Elke Simon-Kuch, includes concerns about exceeding 13% of fat content by weight, for it potentially creates unfair distribution by punishing those who have already taken precautions and redistributing risks to the general public.
  2. The CDU faction's opposition to the proposed risk assessment system, ZÜRS, is also a matter of policy-and-legislation, as they advocate for market-driven solutions and focus on strengthening personal responsibility and education, emphasizing the importance of individual freedom and resistance against governmental overreach.

Read also:

Latest