Last Gen Labeled as Troublesome, Not Criminal
In an unexpected twist, Munich Regional Court has not classified climate protection group Last Generation as a criminal organization. This misconception arose from a misunderstanding of the court's decision, which essentially declared Last Gen as a group posing a potential threat rather than a criminal one.
The court's division on crimes has dismissed claims brought by several activists, deeming raids against Last Gen members as lawful. The reason? Last Gen's activities, such as road and airport blockages, pose a significant risk to public safety, as per the court's interpretation.
As for the claims of illegitimate means and violating social discourse, the court rebuffed them, stating that criminal acts are not a tool for democratic discussion but an expression of criminal energy. It also denounced attempts by groups to place themselves above the law and democratic processes.
The ensuing controversy sparked international discussion, though not centered around the debunked classification of Last Gen as a criminal organization. Instead, it revolved around climate protection activism and freedom of speech. The climate justice movement in Bavaria firmly denied any links to criminal activities, asserting that their protests remain peaceful and awareness-raising.
In response, local climate activists in Munich have vowed to stage peaceful protests against climate injustice, echoing the sentiment of global movements, such as Extinction Rebellion, which have been protesting against the insurance industry's role in fostering fossil fuel projects.
The alleged classification of Last Gen by the Munich Regional Court was, in fact, a misinterpretation, leaving room for further debate on the boundaries of democratic discourse, environmental activism, and the role of legal frameworks in regulating such activities.
Sources (enrichment data): ,
