Skip to content

County allegedly alters status of communes

District leaders and municipal officials within Neuss's jurisdiction are expressing their discontent towards the district's leadership and contemplating potential litigation.

County allegedly shifts the responsibilities of communes
County allegedly shifts the responsibilities of communes

County allegedly alters status of communes

Neuss District's Overpaid Funds: A Battle for Justice

The high-ups in the cities and municipalities within the Rhein-Kreis Neuss district are screaming foul against the district's leadership, as they're outraged by the alleged misappropriation of approximately €8 million. In a joint statement, the mayors of the municipalities accuse the district of "cheating" them out of this sum, claiming that the Rhein-Kreis has been hoarding funds by overspending its budget each year.

The municipalities believe that if they are given the opportunity to claim the surplus funds they've previously paid to the district, it would only be fair. Unfortunately, the district seems determined to keep that surplus for itself - a decision that has left the mayors high and dry, spurring them to seek legal avenues to recoup their losses.

In a detailed chronicle - here it is - the financial officers responsible for the cities and municipalities have listed instances where the Rhein-Kreis failed to return unused budget funds to the municipalities. Based on these calculations, the current total surplus owed to the municipalities amounts to €8.4 million. The issue was previously discussed at a meeting between the mayors, the mayor, and the district administrator at the Neuss town hall in mid-January, but the district administrator has steadfastly refused to return the overpayments.

Regarding their next steps, the mayors and the mayor of these cities and municipalities are now exploring legal options to challenge the district administrator's decision. They argue that it's unacceptable for the municipalities to be forced to boost property taxes in order for the district administrator to pad their coffers.

Join our newsletter!

To stay informed about the latest social happenings, culinary talent, art, and culture in Neuss, sign up for our free newsletter today!

We don't send spam! For more details, visit our privacy policy.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

In the Legal Trenches

Navigating the legal waters for German municipalities intent on reclaiming overpaid funds from the Rhein-Kreis Neuss district requires a keen understanding of various legal principles and practical strategies, depending on the nature of the payment and the legal relationship at play.

  1. Unjust Enrichment (Unrechts Frommigkeit) under § 812 German Civil Code (BGB)The Rhein-Kreis Neuss's refusal to return the overpaid funds may constitute unjust enrichment, enabling the municipalities to claim repayment under § 812 BGB.
  2. Contractual ClaimsIf the overpayment arose from a specific contract, the municipalities may be entitled to contractual remedies, such as correction or termination clauses.
  3. Public Law Repayment Claims (öffentlich-rechtlicher Erstattungsanspruch)If the overpayment took place within public law (e.g., inter-municipal agreements, administrative acts), the municipalities may assert a public law repayment claim under relevant state or federal administrative law.
  4. State Aid Issues (Applies only if the overpayment involves state aid subject to EU law, such as Article 107 TFEU)Special rules may apply, and the European Commission may order the recovery of incompatible state aid, although this is rare for purely domestic municipal disputes.
  5. Indemnity ClausesThe presence of contractual indemnity clauses may complicate the recovery process, and their legality may be scrutinized if they appear to circumvent recovery orders or public law obligations.

Practical Steps

Before initiating legal proceedings:- Gather relevant documentation (payment records, contracts, correspondence)- Issue a formal demand for repayment, specifying the legal basis and amount- Attempt negotiation or mediation to avoid lengthy and costly legal proceedings

  • Statute of Limitations: Claims for repayment must be made within relevant limitation periods (typically three years for civil law claims)
  • Timeframes: Litigation can be time-consuming, with proceedings varying in length depending on the forum and complexity of the case

Court Proceedings

  • Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgericht): Domestic disputes involving public law
  • Civil Court (Amtsgericht or Landgericht): Purely civil law disputes (e.g., contractual or unjust enrichment claims)

Disclaimer

This content is for informational purposes only and not intended as legal advice. If you find yourself in a similar predicament, it's essential to consult with a qualified legal professional for guidance tailored to your specific situation.

The mayors and the mayor of the cities and municipalities in the Rhein-Kreis Neuss district, in their quest for justice against the alleged misappropriation of funds, are delving into the intricacies of policy-and-legislation and politics as they explore various legal principles to challenge the district administrator's decision. The legal landscape for the municipalities includes arguments based on unjust enrichment under § 812 German Civil Code (BGB), contractual claims, public law repayment claims, and state aid issues, among others. As they navigate this complex labyrinth, an understanding of practical strategies and the application of law to their unique circumstances will be crucial in their battle for a fair resolution.

Read also:

Latest

Conflict within city council leads to Mayors stepping down from their positions.

City council discord leads to mayoral departures

Exceptionally high resignation rate among mayors over past two years: researcher Martial Foucault from Cevipof estimates that approximately 400 mayors have stepped down since 2020, which is four times greater than the average between 2008 and 2014, marking an unprecedented trend never witnessed...