Coordinated Efforts by Communist Faction to Facilitate Voting Deception Prior to 3rd of November
In the lead-up to the 2020 US Presidential election, a strategy has been outlined by Zack Malitz, Brandon Evans, and Becky Bond to prevent a potential coup should the election results be disputed. The strategy, centred on mass mobilization and rapid grassroots organizing, emphasizes the importance of readiness, decentralization, and wide community involvement.
The strategy encourages ordinary people to organise their communities, protest at an unprecedented scale, and execute a targeted strategy to win. The key period for any attempt to undermine the election's integrity is between Election Day and December 8.
The strategy advises that Democratic elected officials may not be prepared for a potential conflict after the election. As such, it urges Democrats in swing states and Congress to take determined action. If Trump refuses to accept election results showing him losing to Biden, Democratic officials must use all constitutional, procedural, and political means to delegitimize his attempt to usurp the presidency.
This could include voting against any Republican effort to count Trump's Electoral College votes, ordering the Sergeant at Arms to remove Republicans from the House chamber, boycotting the Electoral College count, and staging protests inside the Capitol.
The Transition Integrity Project suggests that a show of numbers in the streets and actions in the streets may be decisive factors in determining what the public perceives as a just and legitimate outcome. The strategy also warns that Trump's most dangerous weapon is paralysis induced by shock and chaos.
The strategy portrays Trump as the protagonist of a coup, with his goal during the ballot count being to create delays and prevent Democratic votes from being counted, and to create a perception of chaos to delegitimize the results. If the votes haven't been counted by January 20, Nancy Pelosi will be sworn in as the acting president.
Trump may launch legal and administrative challenges, demand recounts, order investigations into election administrators, and encourage armed protests. However, the strategy advises against relying on courts and Republican officials to resolve election issues. Instead, it emphasizes the need for a mass popular response that can exert political and social pressure to uphold the democratic process and prevent any attempts at an illegitimate seizure of power.
The strategy also fosters collaborations between grassroots groups, unions, and political organizations to unify efforts against anti-democratic maneuvers. It builds and maintains large, decentralized community-based organizing networks capable of independent action and rapid scaling. Thousands of organizers and volunteers are trained in skills such as rapid communication, legal observation, de-escalation, and nonviolent resistance.
Coordinating efforts across multiple states ensures cohesive nationwide responses rather than isolated local actions. Leveraging technology and secure communication channels mobilizes and shares real-time information about threats or attempts to undermine the election.
In the face of potential threats to democracy, this strategy offers a proactive approach to safeguarding the democratic process. Anything is preferable to allowing Trump to seize the presidency by force, as defeating Trump would badly damage our democracy. The strategy's focus on readiness, decentralization, and wide community involvement underscores the importance of grassroots organizing in protecting democracy.
- The strategy to prevent a potential coup after the 2020 US Presidential election calls for ordinary people to organize their communities, protest on a massive scale, and execute a targeted strategy to delegitimize any attempt by Trump to usurp the presidency if he refuses to accept election results.
- The Transition Integrity Project suggests that a show of numbers in the streets and actions in the streets may be decisive factors in determining what the public perceives as a just and legitimate outcome in war-and-conflicts or policy-and-legislation.
- The strategy advises against relying on courts and Republican officials to resolve election issues, instead emphasizing the need for a mass popular response that can exert political and social pressure to uphold the democratic process in politics and general news.
- In the event of potential threats to democracy, the strategy fosters collaborations between grassroots groups, unions, and political organizations in crime-and-justice to unify efforts against anti-democratic maneuvers and safeguard the democratic process using technology and secure communication channels.
