Skip to content

controversial election findings: Irregularities and lawlessness reported | Coeur d'Alene Press Press

Refers to Dave Pierson's Elections Letter dated June 8, the author suggestions he, along with others sharing Pierson's view that "no substantial evidence has emerged" pertaining to significant, damaging instances of electoral fraud facilitated by election officials across various levels of U.S....

Referring to Dave Pierson's Elections Letter dated June 8, one might direct him and others who...
Referring to Dave Pierson's Elections Letter dated June 8, one might direct him and others who share his view that there's "no substantial evidence" for significant, suspicious actions/inactions by election officials across various American government levels that allegedly induce fraud, to the conservative, non-partisan educational organization, Judicial Watch.

controversial election findings: Irregularities and lawlessness reported | Coeur d'Alene Press Press

Hey There!

Let's Talk About Elections: The Role of Judicial Watch

On June 8th, if somebody thinks there's no evidence of significant election fraud by officials across America, I'd suggest checking out Judicial Watch's publication Verdict and their Special Election Report 2023-2024. These resources cover numerous instances of potential fraud, where government entities must be sued to obey election laws. But why? If election fraud's as innocuous as they claim, why so many lawsuits, you ask?

Judicial Watch, a non-partisan educational foundation, is known for championing transparency, accountability, and fairness in government and politics [2]. They take on government entities for violating election laws to safeguard voting integrity and enforce federal statutes like the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) [1][5]. By doing so, they work to preserve voter rights and discourage fraud.

Let me share a few examples:

  1. LA County's Cleanup: They sued LA County and, after the lawsuit, over a million ineligible voters were removed from the rolls [1] since the previous year.
  2. DC's Voter Registration: In June 2024, 583 foreign nationals were registered to vote in Washington, D.C., with non-citizens serving as election workers there [1]. 113 non-citizens even voted in the Presidential Primary that same year.
  3. Mississippi's Extended Deadline: Mississippi illegally extended the ballot receipt deadline for the November 2024 Presidential and VP Electors election [1].
  4. Pennsylvania's Registration Tidy-Up: After being pressured by Judicial Watch, Pennsylvania removed 178,258 ineligible registrations and agreed to a 5-year roll cleanup with transparency [1].

These instances are just a handful of the many election irregularities and unlawfulness exposed across the nation for years [1]. Our elections aren't perfect—they need watchdogs like Judicial Watch to protect their integrity [1].

So, Let's Stay Vigilant!

TED TURRENTINE

Coeur d'Alene[1] https://www.judicialwatch.org/[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch[3] https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/21-565.html[4] https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judicial-watch-files-supreme-court-lawsuit-challenging-illinois-mail-ballots-2021-06-23/[5] https://www.justice.gov/crt/voting/nvra/nvra-enforcement-court-decisions

  1. In the realm of policy-and-legislation, Judicial Watch's work in elections highlights the importance of watchdog organizations, as they strive to ensure compliance with election laws and safeguard voter rights, often taking legal action against government entities when necessary.
  2. The role of Judicial Watch in general-news extends beyond elections, as they diligently work to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and fairness in education and politics, often shedding light on instances of potential election fraud and irregularities, thereby playing a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of democratic processes.

Read also:

Latest