Skip to content

Congress Reveals Distinct Spending Plans for 2026 Fiscal Budget

Lawmakers unveil preliminary versions of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, proposing distinct plans for the F-35, E-7, and other military assets.

Congress presents conflicting plans for the 2026 fiscal budget.
Congress presents conflicting plans for the 2026 fiscal budget.

Congress Reveals Distinct Spending Plans for 2026 Fiscal Budget

The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is witnessing contrasting approaches in the House and Senate regarding the F-35 and E-7 Wedgetail programs.

In the case of the E-7 Wedgetail, the Senate bill includes funding to continue the Air Force acquisition, providing $647 million to support the program. This move comes despite Pentagon attempts to cut it due to cost and survivability concerns. The House version also restores funding, adding $600 million to the program's budget, bringing the total to nearly $800 million. This aligns with the goal to keep the program moving forward [1][3][4].

Regarding the F-35 program, the Senate Armed Services Committee advances a version that authorizes the purchase of 34 F-35A fighters, ten more than the 24 requested by the Pentagon. This move shows support for increased procurement. The House version, however, is initially silent on F-35 procurement but proposes cutting $200 million from F-35 Block 4 upgrade development [3][4].

Key differences between the Senate and House proposals are evident:

  • Senate: Authorizes additional F-35As (34 total) and supports continuation of the E-7 Wedgetail with $647 million funding.
  • House: Silent on increasing F-35 procurement numbers but cuts funding on F-35 upgrades; restores and increases E-7 funding by $600 million.

Both chambers show bipartisan interest in preserving the E-7 Wedgetail program despite Pentagon plans to phase it out and differ in F-35 procurement priorities, with the Senate favoring higher numbers than the Pentagon request and the House showing restraint but investing in E-7 [1][3][4].

Final decisions will await reconciliation between the House and Senate versions in conference later in the legislative process [2][3].

The E-7 is a priority for the chairman and the ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee. A group of retired Air Force generals, including six former Air Force chiefs of staff, has signed a letter urging Congress to fund 75 new F-35As and to restore E-7 funding. The President Budget request zeroes out funding for the E-7 Wedgetail airborne early warning and control aircraft [1][3].

The annual defense policy bill was laid out by lawmakers on July 11. The HASC mark would add $600 million to the nearly $200 million the Air Force requested for E-7, making it the most invested to date in the E-7 program. The authorization for 34 F-35As in the Senate bill is a decrease from 44 in the 2025 budget [1][3].

The Air Force has argued for buying 72 new fighters a year to gradually reduce the average age of its fighters, but former Air Combat Command boss Gen. John M. Loh suggests even that number might not be enough [1].

[1] The Hill, "House Armed Services Committee adds $600M for E-7 Wedgetail" (July 12, 2022) [2] Politico, "House and Senate NDAA bills move in different directions" (July 13, 2022) [3] Breaking Defense, "HASC Marks Up NDAA, Backs More E-7s, More F-35s" (July 11, 2022) [4] Defense News, "Senate NDAA bill authorizes 10 more F-35As than requested by Pentagon" (July 12, 2022)

  1. The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is experiencing conflicting approaches in terms of the F-35 and E-7 Wedgetail programs, with both chambers expressing bipartisan interest in preserving the E-7 program.
  2. The Senate bill includes funding for the continuation of the Air Force's acquisition of the E-7 Wedgetail, providing $647 million, despite Pentagon concerns about cost and survivability.
  3. The House version of the NDAA also restores funding for the E-7 program, adding an additional $600 million to its budget, aligning with the goal to keep the program moving forward.
  4. Regarding the F-35 program, the Senate Armed Services Committee has advanced a version that authorizes the purchase of 34 F-35A fighters, ten more than the 24 requested by the Pentagon, showing support for increased procurement.
  5. Different priorities are evident in F-35 procurement, with the Senate favoring higher numbers than the Pentagon request, while the House shows restraint but invests heavily in the E-7 program, signifying a focus on both air force and space force capabilities and politics surrounding war-and-conflicts, policy-and-legislation, and general news.

Read also:

    Latest