Confirmation of Latvia's New Ministers for Education, Welfare, and Transportation
In a recent parliamentary vote, Atis Švinka was appointed as the Minister for Transport, receiving the support of 52 MPs. However, the opposition argues that this change will not bring about any significant shifts within the government.
Simultaneously, Edvards Smiltēns of the United List expressed concerns about the government's low level of public trust. He questioned the government's plan of action, stating that the new ministers' action plans are currently non-existent.
The appointment of Uzulnieks as Minister for Welfare also faced opposition, with 16 MPs voting against him. Despite this, 72 MPs expressed their confidence in Uzulnieks.
Meanwhile, Melbārde was confirmed as Minister for Education, receiving the votes of 54 MPs. However, 35 MPs were against her appointment.
Smiltēns also raised concerns about the stability of the government, stating that it is "hanging by a thread" and requires a broad coalition to avoid collapse. He further expressed doubt about the new ministers' abilities, stating that there is no word on what they will be better at.
It is worth noting that Švinka served as Parliamentary Secretary at the Ministry of Defense, while Uzulnieks served as Parliamentary Secretary at the Ministry of Welfare. Melbārde previously served as Parliamentary Secretary at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
In the vote for Švinka's appointment as Transport Minister, only coalition representatives and two independent MPs voted in favour. Conversely, 41 MPs voted against his appointment.
These developments come at a time when the Latvian government faces increasing scrutiny and criticism. The public's trust in the government remains a concern, with Smiltēns' statements indicating a need for clearer action plans and greater transparency from the government.
The opposition maintains that the appointment of Atis Švinka as Minister for Transport will not fundamentally alter the political landscape within the government. Edvards Smiltēns, a prominent political figure, voiced his concerns about the government's eroding public trust, specifically questioning the absence of action plans from the newly appointed ministers.
