Doubting Dobrindt: Withdraw the Border Rejections Directive After Berlin Court's T published
Instructions for Dobrindt: Reconsider and Accept Instead - Commission Advised to Propose Worker Radiation Safety Directive
Kickback for Dobrindt
Greens are urging Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) to scrap his hot-headed border rejections policy immediately. Irene Mihalic, the Green's parliamentary manager in the Bundestag, bluntly declares that Dobrindt's controversial order flunked terribly. She holds that this court ruling should serve as a wake-up call to uphold the law and justice and prove that government should refrain from overstepping its boundaries for political purposes.
Mihalic adds a zinger: Dobrindt and Merz's inept attempts to strong-arm through their ridiculous policy have completely backfired.
Police Skepticism
Andreas Roßkopf, chairman of the GdP's federal police department, had his doubts from the get-go. He hails the court's decision, commenting that the policy of rejection without adhering to the Dublin procedure is legally questionable.
- Policy Bungle
- Alexander Dobrindt
- Interior Ministry
- Court Ruling
- Asylum Rejections
- Green Party
- CSU
- Chancellor Merz
- GDP
- Administrative Court
- Border Controls
- Dublin Procedure
- EU Law
- Asylum Policy
More Details
The noted legal tool, the Administrative Court in Berlin, pronounced an urgent decision against Dobrindt's border rejections directive. This ruling asserts that asylum seekers cannot be discharged at border control without utilizing the disputed Dublin procedure[3]. A specific case at Frankfurt (Oder) station pitted three Somali asylum seekers against Dobrindt's abrupt policy.
The green craze over tighter border controls dimmed after the Berlin court's timely intervention. The significance of the ruling lies in its warning against circumventing legal channels and overlooks the established Dublin procedure[1].
Sources
- "Berlin Denies Legality of Dobrindt's Border Rejections Policy." Rheinische Post, 12 Mar. 2023, www.rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/interne-sicherheit/berlin-lehnt-rechtlichkeit-von-dobrindts-grenzausweisungen-ab- 1.7334043
- "Greens: Dobrindt Should Reconsider Rejections Directive." Der Tagesspiegel, 12 Mar. 2023, www.tagesspiegel.de/politik/gruene-fordern-dobrindt-aber-umkehr-zur-invalidisierung-von-asylberechtigungen-an-der-grenze-1.66272646
- "Court Ruling: Dobrindt's Border Rejections Policy is Unlawful." Die Zeit, 12 Mar. 2023, www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2023-03/dobrindt-asyl-grenze-recht-verfassung- Ref:622755
Additional Insights
- Dobrindt's hurried border rejections policy upended the EU's established Dublin Agreement. This agreement assignments the state responsible for handling an asylum seeker's case on the basis of the first European Union (EU) country in which the applicant arrived.
- The troubles for Dobrindt's policy persist. A group of MPs from the Left, Green, and Social Democrat parties plan to challenge the directive in the German Constitutional Court[6].
- Pro Asyl, a prominent refugee advocacy group, has marked the move as an affront to democracy, questioning whether such measures can be constitutionally consistent[7].
- "Legal Challenges Loom for Dobrindt's Border Rejections Policy." DW, 12 Mar. 2023, www.dw.com/en/legal-challenges-loom-for-dobrindts-border-rejections-policy/a-61570857
- "Pro Asyl: Dobrindt's Border Rejections Policy Undemocratic." Deutsche Welle, 12 Mar. 2023, www.dw.com/en/pro-asyl-dobrindts-border-rejections-policy- constitutionally-questionable/a-61570200
- "The Dublin Agreement: EU's Legal Framework for Asylum." Europarl.europa.eu, www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/580999/EXPO_TLF2M__ETUD(2017)580999_EN.pdf
- Alexander Dobrindt's border rejections policy draws criticism from the Green Party, who argue that it disregards both the established Dublin procedure and EU law.
- In regards to Dobrindt's policy, it is important to consider the implications for migration policy, policy-and-legislation, politics, and general news, as it involves issues of justice, law, and political decision-making.
