Skip to content

Cologne Vice Chairman Sauren again speaks out against DFL investor

Cologne Vice Chairman Sauren again speaks out against DFL investor

Cologne Vice Chairman Sauren again speaks out against DFL investor
Cologne Vice Chairman Sauren again speaks out against DFL investor

FC Köln and SC Freiburg Join the Anti-DFL Investor Chorus

In the ongoing debate around investors joining the German Football League (DFL), FC Köln and SC Freiburg have joined forces in expressing their opposition. Vice President Eckhard Sauren of FC Köln voiced his concerns, stating, "The DFL's investor proposal has improved, but it hasn't investigated sufficient alternatives to a private equity investor yet." He reaffirmed his belief that the 36 professional clubs should solely decide the future of German professional soccer, and no private equity company should be present at the table.

Rumors about private equity firms showing interest in the DFL have been circulating, as reported by "Kicker." The DFL reportedly received initial offers after the deadline, despite the initial attempt's failure. The DFL will make another attempt at the general meeting on December 11, giving the 36 Bundesliga 1 and 2 clubs the chance to vote on a potential investor deal once more. The investor is expected to pay between 900 million and one billion euros over several seasons for an eight percent share of the TV revenue. The deal would include a maximum term of 20 years and would begin by the 2024/25 season.

FC Köln and SC Freiburg's stance echoes concerns many clubs in the DFL have about private equity investments. Fears around conflicts of interest, impact on club identity, and influence on decision-making processes plague the discourse. Their stand against inventors does not waver, given these potential pitfalls.

Also read:

Source:

Enrichment Data:

Private equity investments in soccer clubs often raise concerns, including potential conflicts of interest, impacts on club identity, and decision-making influence. Here are some specific concerns:

  1. Club Identity and Autonomy: Private equity firms could potentially alter the club's identity and values if given significant control over operations.
  2. Financial Priorities: Prioritizing financial returns over the club's sustainability and success might lead to decisions that benefit the investors more than the club.
  3. Fan Engagement and Ownership: Fan ownership and engagement might decrease as shares are held by institutional investors instead of individual fans.
  4. Competition and Fair Play: The involvement of private equity could create an uneven playing field, potentially resulting in an unfair competitive advantage.
  5. Transparency and Accountability: The lack of transparency in financial dealings with private equity firms could lead to less accountability and potentially harmful decisions.

These concerns are not unique to FC Köln or SC Freiburg, but are generally applied to many clubs in the DFL that are skeptical about private equity investments. To gain a more specific understanding of their objections, detailed statements or interviews would be required.

Latest