Skip to content

Collapse of the Dutch Coalition Governance Not Marking the End of Brutality

Far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders decided to dissolve the government coalition, as he deemed the transition into an authoritarian state wasn't happening fast enough according to his standards. This disbandment of the coalition does not signal an end to potential escalation.

Far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders exited the nation's coalition government, expressing...
Far-right Dutch politician Geert Wilders exited the nation's coalition government, expressing dissatisfaction over insufficient speed in implementing authoritarian state reforms. However, this departure does not signal a halt in heavy-handed policies.

Collapse of the Dutch Coalition Governance Not Marking the End of Brutality

Harshest Asylum Policies Yet: A Dutch Coalition Promise

Geert Wilders, leader of the far-right Party for Freedom (PVV), has stirred controversy by promising the toughest asylum measures to date. Entering the coalition as the largest faction in parliament, Wilders aimed to curb migrant and refugee rights through a national state of emergency declaration. Lately, he's demanded a ten-point border-closing plan when the state restructuring proved too slow.

Wilders' draconian takeover of the Dutch government has been halted, temporarily, due to his party abandoning the coalition. Recent polls indicate a decline in support, leading him to preempt potential losses in upcoming elections by shutting down the government.

Other coalition parties have been praised for standing firm against Wilders' extreme proposals, even if it jeopardized other policy areas. Nevertheless, the neoliberal VVD party and socially conservative NSC, by coalitioning with the PVV, have inadvertently escalated the Dutch state's barbarization.

While the proposed authoritarian state of emergency has been postponed, it's crucial to acknowledge that the VVD and NSC partnered with the PVV, aware of Wilders' belligerent plans. Consequently, they've unwittingly bulldozed the decorum of the Dutch state.

As for Wilders' asylum-related proposals, they shake the very foundation of human and civil rights:

  1. Asylum Suspension: Wilders advocates for a complete halt to the national asylum system, effectively ceasing all new asylum applications[1][2][3].
  2. Temporary Pause on Family Reunions: This plan aims for a temporary stop to family reunification for refugees granted refugee status[1][2][3].
  3. Syrian Repatriation: All Syrians seeking asylum or currently in the Netherlands on a temporary visa would be forcibly returned to Syria[1][3]. However, experts argue that this plan contradicts European human rights laws and the UN Refugee Convention, as Syria is not considered a safe country[4].
  4. Asylum Center Closure: Existing reception centers for asylum seekers would shut down instead of adopting measures to address overcrowding and inhumane conditions[1][3].
  5. Revocation of Dutch Nationality and Deportation: Individuals with dual nationality convicted of violent or sexual crimes would lose their Dutch nationality and be expelled[3].
  6. Militarized Borders: The deployment of the army to secure land borders has been proposed[2].

These measures have garnered criticism for violating international human rights standards and sparking a government crisis in the Netherlands[1][2][4].

  1. The controversial asylum policy proposals by Geert Wilders, including a suspension of the national asylum system, a temporary pause on family reunions for refugees, forced repatriation of Syrians, and the closure of asylum centers, have drawn criticism for violating international human rights standards.
  2. The Dutch coalition's emphasis on strict policies in areas such as politics, policy-and-legislation, general-news, and crime-and-justice, particularly regarding immigration and asylum issues, has sparked controversy and raised concerns about the potential infringement on human rights.

Read also:

Latest