In the chilly January weather, Sassnitz's town council is set to convene an unscheduled meeting on the 11th, centering around a heated citizens' petition against the impending LNG terminal. This neighborhood project has ignited a flurry of opposition, which culminated in over a thousand signatures demanding a referendum. The council spokesperson confirmed that the evening's agenda would cover the petition's admissibility.
The district's lower legal supervisory authority has completed its assessment, but the details are yet to be publicly disclosed. Critics, including the state ombudsman, have expressed concerns over the prolonged legal examination process.
The drama unfolds in Sassnitz, a town nestled in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, where Fährhafen Sassnitz GmbH's 90% ownership by the town adds a local twist to this intriguing tale. The proposed construction and operation of LNG infrastructure at the port ignites a heated debate, with some emphasizing its potential detrimental effects on the environment and tourism, while others vehemently argue its significance for energy supply security.
The LNG terminal in Mukran, just a stone's throw away, remains a magnet for controversy. Operating since around mid-2022, it has welcomed fewer than ten tankers, leaving its operational capacity languishing at only 8%, according to Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH). The terminal's low utilization rate and reliance on potentially environmentally damaging fracking gas have fueled the outrage.
Sassnitz's town council's deliberations will undoubtedly delve into the validity of the citizens' concerns. These could range from evaluating the environmental impact, weighing economic benefits against costs, to scrutinizing the petition's legal standing.
Additional Insights:
- While the Sassnitz community's opposition to the LNG terminal can be inferred from collected signatures, precise details about the concerns and specific reasons for their petition remain elusive.
- The international connection of the LNG terminal in Mukran, as exemplified by the recent U.S. fracking gas shipment, raises concerns about its environmental impact and potential heavy reliance on controversial gas sources.
- The low utilization rates of the terminal might be interpreted as a sign of its redundancy or unreliability, further fueling local opposition.
- The participants in the debate will likely include not only the town council, district officials, and the Ministry of the Interior in Schwerin but also environmental organizations and concerned citizens.
- The approval process for the terminal's stationing and operation is still ongoing, highlighting the complexity of managing the project's environmental and legal aspects.
[1]Source:
