Skip to content

Changing Time in 2025 to Daylight Saving Time: Should You Advance or Retract Your Hands?

Daylight Saving Time Adjustment in 2025: Will the Clock Hands Advance or Retreat?

Ready, Set, Spring Forward! Navigating Daylight Saving Time on March 30th

- Changing Time in 2025 to Daylight Saving Time: Should You Advance or Retract Your Hands?

By: Annette Berger

As the coming Sunday, March 30, 2025, approaches, it's time to bid farewell to a precious hour of sleep. That's right, daylight saving time (DST) is upon us, and it's time to set our clocks forward by an hour—from 2 am to 3 am. Prepare yourself for those long, bright evenings and short, sleep-deprived mornings, because we've got a whole season to experience it!

While DST has been a part of everyday life in Germany since the 1980s, the debate over its merits and drawbacks continues to rage. Every year, we find ourselves asking the same question: Which way do the clock hands move? Well, fellow sleep-deprived souls, it's easier than you think—just remember the saying "put it on the porch in the spring, then put it back in the cellar in the fall."

But is DST going to be a thing of the past soon? The idea of abolishing it has been bandied about, though it never quite gets off the ground. Back in 2018, the European Union even tried to outlaw it, but alas, the plan fell through. So, DST marches on, whether we like it or not.

Saving Energy? Maybe, Maybe Not

One of the main claims behind DST is that it helps conserve energy by increasing daylight usage. However, the evidence supporting this is shaky at best. According to environmental agencies, the energy savings are negligible, as DST leads to lower energy consumption in one area but higher consumption in another[1][4].

Furthermore, the notion of energy conservation through DST isn't exactly new. In fact, Germany first introduced DST during World War I to save energy, only to abandon it shortly thereafter due to public displeasure[5].

Is DST Bad for Your Health?

DST wreaks havoc on our sleep patterns, but what other health risks does it pose? According to sleep specialists, a year-round standard time might be more beneficial for our health[3]. The late-night brightness, for instance, encourages many to stay up later than they should, resulting in sleep deprivation.

And, as if that weren't enough, there are hidden dangers we don't often consider. The automobile club, ADAC, warns of increased driver fatigue due to the time change[6]. Moreover, the risk of collisions with crepuscular animals like deer and wild boar skyrockets when switching to winter time, as animals don't adhere to human schedules or time changes[6].

Whether you're a frequent traveler or not, the time change presents challenges for everyone, even Deutsche Bahn. Although adjusting the clocks may cause some disruptions, the company has faced this hurdle for decades and handles it with aplomb.

The process is mostly seamless, with trains simply skipping a few minutes when switching to DST and making up the lost time when switching back to standard time[6]. The ADAC advises extra caution on rural roads during these periods due to the increased risk of collisions with animals migrating during those critical hours[6].

The Great DST Debate: Energy, Health, and Public Opinion

While the merits of DST remain contentious, its energy-saving claims leave something to be desired. In fact, studies show that any potential energy savings are largely offset by increased heating in the mornings and increased energy consumption due to longer leisure hours[1][4].

Moreover, the health impacts of DST are significant. The biannual time changes disrupt our circadian rhythms, affecting sleep patterns, mood, mental health, metabolism, and weight regulation[2][3].

Public sentiment in Germany leans strongly toward abolishing DST, with numerous surveys indicating up to 76% support for its elimination[2]. Meanwhile, discussions at the European level remain inconclusive, with some countries proposing permanent summer or standard time[1][4].

In conclusion, while DST promises energy savings and outdoor activities, its real-world impact on energy consumption is minimal, and it comes with substantial health risks due to circadian disruptions. Given the negative health effects and the widespread popular opposition, the fate of DST in Germany and beyond remains to be seen.

Sources: NDR, Deutsche Bahn, Deutschlandfunk, Umweltbundesamt, Lok-Report, ADAC.

  • Daylight saving time
  • Time change
  • Energy conservation
  • Health effects
  • Public opinion

Community policy discussions in Germany might include the potential repeal of daylight saving time (DST), given the ongoing debate and growing public opposition. Employment policy could also be affected as the shift in time might lead to work-related issues, such as adjusting schedules and dealing with potential disruptions. The Umweltbundesamt, being an environmental agency, may be involved in evaluating the environmental impact of DST and assessing its claim of energy conservation. In the year 2025, many will be preparing for the annual time change by adjusting their clocks, with the preservation of energy being a questionable benefit.

Read also:

Latest