Skip to content

Chancellor confronts series of blunders, amends errors made

Peers questioned Reeves' management of public finances due to a series of mistakes she made during a recent scrutiny.

Chancellor confronts series of blunders and makes necessary amends
Chancellor confronts series of blunders and makes necessary amends

Chancellor confronts series of blunders, amends errors made

In a series of recent statements, Rachel Reeves, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, has made several inaccuracies regarding the unemployment rate, public finances, and the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS).

Firstly, it has been clarified that Ms. Reeves underestimated the unemployment rate, stating it as "just over 4%" when the actual figure is closer to 5% (4.7%).

Secondly, Ms. Reeves is preparing to fill a hole of up to £50 billion in the public finances in her Autumn Budget. The key to how much money she needs to find is how the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) judges likely productivity growth - the rate of hourly output per worker. A downgrade in productivity growth forecast by the OBR would have 'very significant fiscal implications that far exceed the policy U-turns on welfare spending.' Productivity growth stalled in the second quarter, heaping pressure on the OBR to act.

Thirdly, Ms. Reeves has been found to be mistaken about the location of a planned tram network extension. She stated it would go to Bury and "somewhere else", when in fact it is going to Stockport, more than 20 miles away from Bury.

Fourthly, concerning the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS), Ms. Reeves has stated that the number of pools for the LGPS is being cut from eight to six. However, the correct number of administering authorities for the LGPS in England and Wales is 90 funds. These administering authorities manage and administer the LGPS locally, while the scheme rules are set nationally.

Lastly, Ms. Reeves has pledged to stick to her fiscal rules, which include only borrowing to invest by the end of this Parliament. She has ruled out tax rises on "working people" (income tax, VAT, and employee National Insurance), but has left the door open to raids on inheritance tax, pensions, gambling companies, and banks.

It is essential for public figures to maintain factual accuracy in their statements to ensure transparency and trust with the public. This article aims to clarify the errors made by Ms. Reeves and provide accurate information on the topics discussed.

  1. In the upcoming Autumn Budget, Ms. Reeves' plan to address a potential £50 billion gap in public finances relies on the productivity growth rate forecasted by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).
  2. It has been revealed that Ms. Reeves misrepresented the number of administering authorities for the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) in England and Wales, stating it would be cut from eight to six, when in fact there are 90 funds.
  3. While Ms. Reeves has ruled out tax rises on working people, she has left the door open for potential changes in taxes on inheritance, pensions, gambling companies, and banks. These decisions fall within the realm of policy-and-legislation, closely tied to political debates and the general-news.

Read also:

    Latest