Cease inciting Britons about their historical conscience
In recent years, a series of seminars and training sessions have been held within the civil service, aiming to address issues of race and colonial history. However, these sessions have sparked controversy and criticism, with some arguing they promote a sense of national self-loathing rather than fostering a balanced understanding of history.
Frank Furedi, a social commentator, has been at the forefront of this debate, criticising these seminars for making civil servants feel ashamed or guilty about their nation's history, particularly focusing on Britain's colonial past. A recent example of such a seminar was the hour-long session organised by His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC), which explored "the emotional weight of colonial history" and the "emotional complexity" associated with British and South Asian identities.
Critics argue that these seminars encourage a national culture of guilt rather than constructive engagement with history. They also suggest that they potentially undermine civil servants’ morale and sense of identity by framing British history primarily in terms of shame. This has led to public backlash and media controversy, as seen with the cancellation of further sessions like the HMRC seminar, though not due to rejection of the seminar’s content but because it was considered inappropriate during work hours.
The controversy extends beyond the civil service. In 2021, the Scottish government issued anti-racism guidance to teachers, stating that those socialized as white grew up in a world where they were consistently told that their way of life is the right, sophisticated, enlightened way to be. This worldview, according to critics, must be challenged to prevent a harmful national self-loathing and to foster a more balanced understanding of history.
The debate over how Britain's history is taught and remembered is far from over. Concerns have been raised that some government actions might overemphasise negative aspects of British history at the expense of a more nuanced view. Kehinde Andrews, a professor of black studies at Birmingham City University, has argued in a YouTube video that Britain is a 'colonial, wicked nation' and that too many Brits suffer from the 'psychosis of whiteness'.
However, it is essential to approach these discussions with an open mind and a commitment to understanding the complexities of our nation's past. As Furedi suggests, we must strive for a balanced understanding of history, one that acknowledges both our achievements and our mistakes, and uses that knowledge to build a better future.
If you're interested in delving deeper into these issues, we recommend checking out 'The state we're in', a podcast hosted by Steve Baker, or reading our article 'The insanity of the Palestine Action ban'. Your support helps us continue providing thought-provoking content. Consider joining us as a supporter or patron to gain access to comments on our articles, and help us keep our website going and growing. Thank you!
- The debate about the teaching and remembrance of Britain's history extends to the general-news sphere, as claims of overemphasizing its negative aspects have been raised.
- Some argue that certain government actions, like the inclusion of identity politics in seminars and training sessions, potentially undermine free speech and foster a national culture of guilt, rather than promoting constructive engagement with history.
- In light of the controversy surrounding the way British history is portrayed, it is crucial to uphold free speech and promote a balanced understanding of culture, politics, and history, focusing on both achievements and mistakes to build a better future.
