Breakdown of the California National Guard Dispute with President Trump
Trump maintains temporary authority over the California National Guard, as ruled by the Court of Appeals. - California's National Guard Remains Under Trump's Command.
You've landed on an update about the ongoing legal tussle between President Trump and California's Governor, Gavin Newsom, concerning the National Guard's control during protests against U.S. immigration policies. Let's dive into the juicy details:
Background
- Protest Waves: The city of Los Angeles witnessed protests ignited by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations, which commenced on June 6, 2025[2]. In response, Trump federalized 2,000 California National Guard members, fueling a legal challenge from Governor Newsom.
The Court's Word
- U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's Decision: On June 12, 2025, Judge Breyer declared Trump's deployment of the National Guard as illegal and unconstitutional. The judge discovered that the conditions did not fit the legal definition of a "rebellion," which is a prerequisite for such a deployment in federal law[1][3].
- Legal Grounds: The ruling was rooted in arguments that Trump surpassed his statutory authority and violated the Tenth Amendment, which restricts federal control over state affairs[3].
The Appeals Court's Action
- Temporary Block of Lower Court Order: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals suspended Judge Breyer's order, thus allowing Trump to maintain authority over the National Guard troops in California for now[3].
- Planned Hearing: The appeals court has scheduled a hearing scheduled for June 17, 2025, to reexamine the issue[3].
- Trump Administration's Attitude: The White House argued that the district court overreached its jurisdiction by contesting the President's role as Commander in Chief[3].
Governor Newsom's Take
- ** applause **(if needed): Governor Newsom commended the initial ruling, framing it as a test for democracy. He looked to block the deployment, arguing it was both morally reprehensible and legally baseless[2][3].
Trump Administration's Reaction
- Righteous Retort: The White House described Judge Breyer's order as "unprecedented" and pledged to appeal, insisting that Trump's actions were lawful and vital in safeguarding federal personnel and property[3].
Stick around for more updates on this heated debate between the executive and the legislative branches!
- In the midst of the California National Guard dispute with President Trump, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Los Angeles, California, temporarily blocked the lower court's order against Trump's deployment of the National Guard troops.
- The ongoing legal tussle between President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom, sparked by immigration policy protests, has sparked political debates on war-and-conflicts, policy-and-legislation, and the balance of power between the US President and state governors, as seen in the Court of Appeals' ruling and the Defense Department's response.
