Skip to content

California power struggle: What authority does Trump possess?

Political Tussle in California: Understanding Trump's Authority

Trump adopts aggressive strategy in California.
Trump adopts aggressive strategy in California.

L.A. Protests: Understanding Trump's Actions and Potential Escalations in California

California power struggle: Trump's jurisdictions explained - California power struggle: What authority does Trump possess?

Hey there! Let's delve into the current situation in California, where President Trump has taken an unusual step by taking control of the National Guard and sending military forces to Los Angeles amid ongoing protests against his immigration policies. What gives Trump the legal ground for his actions, and what could be next? Here's the lowdown:

What's the legal justification for Trump's moves?

Trump has seized control of California's National Guard under Title 10 of the United States Code. Normally, states manage their National Guard, a military reserve unit that can be deployed in case of emergencies. However, this law allows the president to take charge in times of rebellion or danger of rebellion against the federal government, which Trump argues the protests are.

It's worth noting that this hasn't happened since 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson deployed military forces, in addition to the National Guard, to support demonstrators during the Civil Rights movement in Alabama.

What powers do the National Guard and Marine Corps wield?

The Marine Corps, unlike the National Guard, is always under federal control and primarily focuses on warfare and national security. On Monday, Trump sent 700 Marine Corps troops to Los Angeles, but the legal grounds for this action aren't entirely clear. The soldiers' role is to support the National Guard in securing federal employees and property.

Legal experts state that the National Guard can protect immigration officers or buildings, but they should steer clear of normal law enforcement activities like arrests or raids. Trump's actions in California have sparked numerous legal questions and are likely to keep the courts busy.

What's the next level of escalation?

For the National Guard and likely the Marine Corps to receive broader powers, Trump would need to announce martial law and invoke the Insurrection Act. This 1807 law allows the president to deploy the military domestically for law enforcement purposes, though this is unusual in the U.S. Johnson took this step in 1965 during the riots in Los Angeles over the police brutality case of Rodney King.

However, unlike today, the governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles requested federal assistance from then-President George H.W. Bush at the time. Trump has threatened to use the Insurrection Act during his term and mentioned it during his campaign, though he hasn't ruled it out now.

What does enacting the Insurrection Act mean?

Activating martial law could result in the U.S. military being deployed for law enforcement within California, potentially leading to the arrest of protesters or raids. Invoking the Insurrection Act could further divide the nation politically and socially, potentially escalating the situation and instigating countrywide protests.

"If the president invokes the Insurrection Act, we're going to see significant legal battles in the coming hours, days, and weeks over whether these broad powers can be exercised under the current circumstances," Jessica Levinson, a law professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles, reportedly stated. "Everyone should pause when the president uses emergency powers, and the governor and mayor should say, 'Please don't, we don't need this.'"

  • California
  • Los Angeles
  • Donald Trump
  • National Guard
  • U.S. President
  • USA
  • Military
  • Power struggle
  • Legal challenge
  • Civil liberties
  • Political divide
  • Martial law
  • Protests
  • Insurrection Act
  • Civil rights
  1. The Commission, in light of recent events, has also been asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to ionizing radiation, particularly in the context of war-and-conflicts and policy-and-legislation, given the increased use of radiation in military applications.
  2. As the political landscape shifts in the USA, the ongoing protests in California over immigration policies have brought to light the need for clearer policies and legislation regarding the use of martial law, a topic that has direct connections to crime-and-justice and politics.
  3. Amidst the escalating situation in Los Angeles, there has been growing debate on the role of sports in creating a sense of unity and promoting general-news stories that focus on positive aspects of society, offering a counterpoint to the continually contentious crime-and-justice and politics headlines.

Read also:

Latest