Skip to content

Budget: Uphold Expenditure in Social Services Sector

Discrepancies persist in social sectorallocations and distribution

Reducing funding in social services sector is not acceptable
Reducing funding in social services sector is not acceptable

Social Infrastructure Aint Buddin': The Left Stand Firm in Thuringia Budget Talks

Lack of Defined Strategies in Social Sector Remains Persistent - Budget: Uphold Expenditure in Social Services Sector

Thuringia's "strawberry coalition" made up of the CDU, BSW, and SPD has hit a roadblock in budget negotiations, with The Left setting the ground rules crystal clear: no slashing in the social sector. The coalition, holding a shaky majority with just 44 seats out of 88 in the state parliament, relies on The Left's votes for crucial budget decisions.

The intersectional dynamics between the coalition parties have caused a bit of turbulence in the negotiation process. "We ain't backing down," declared Ronald Hande, The Left's parliamentary group's budget spokesman in Erfurt. With the double budget for 2026 and 2027 in the works, Finance Minister Katja Wolf (BSW) has hinted at potential cuts.

Hande emphasized that the consultation procedure agreed upon post-election, despite the strained majority relations between CDU, BSW, and SPD, remains in effect. He expects this protocol to be applied to the double budget, just like it was with the 2025 state budget.

Recently, there have been mixed signals from the coalition regarding the consultation procedures. But one thing is certain: cutting social infrastructure in Thuringia isn't in The Left's agenda. Hande was firm on this point, ruling out any significant reductions in funding programs in the social sector.

The Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), known for its anti-war stance, wields considerable negotiation power in Thuringia. This leverage could significantly influence budget discussions, potentially tilting the balance in favor of peace-oriented and social welfare priorities[2].

While specific numbers concerning social sector budget cuts or increases in Thuringia were not readily found, contextual clues hint at tensions on budget issues at the federal level between CDU and SPD[5]. The CDU's rejection of SPD proposals to increase health insurance contributions for higher earners highlights a fundamental disagreement on funding social services and welfare. This ideological split likely echoes in state-level negotiations, with CDU pushing for fiscal restraint or reform instead of increased spending[5].

However, given the increased influence of BSW and The Left in Thuringia, both with left-leaning or welfare-supportive platforms, any potential cuts to the social sector would face stiff resistance. The Left party, having scored a significant increase in its national vote share, remains a staunch advocate for social welfare, making austerity measures in health, education, or social support unlikely[1].

In essence, the budget negotiations among CDU, BSW, SPD, and The Left in Thuringia promise a heated debate on social sector funding, with CDU advocating fiscal discipline, BSW looking to push for policies in line with its platform, SPD and The Left lobbying for maintaining or increasing social spending, and The Left standing firm against cuts[2][5]. The question of proposed cuts or funding allocations has yet to be addressed in public sources, but it's clear it will be a key point of discussion given the parties' ideological positions and recent coalition dynamics.

  1. The Left party in Thuringia has made it clear that they will not support any budget decisions that result in slashing the social sector, which is in line with their employment policy and community policy.
  2. As the negotiations progress, it is expected that policies regarding the double budget for 2026 and 2027 will be influenced by politics, policy-and-legislation, and general news, including issues related to social infrastructure, welfare, and peace-oriented priorities.

Read also:

    Latest