Brigitte Macron Faces Legal Action Over Alleged Financial Profit from Candace Owens' False Statements
In the heart of the digital age, a legal battle is unfolding between U.S. conservative commentator Candace Owens and French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte. The defamation lawsuit, filed in Delaware in July 2025, centers around Owens' spread of conspiracy theories about Brigitte Macron, including the baseless allegation that she was born male.
Owens has responded defiantly to the lawsuit, framing it as proof that her claims are true. In her statement, she argued that the Macrons' lawsuit is an attempt to "silence dissent" and suppress her free speech. However, the Macrons' legal team argues that Owens has been engaging in a "year-long campaign of misinformation for personal gain," spreading these lies to generate revenue from her controversial content.
Key allegations behind the lawsuit include Owens' public statement that she would "stake [her] entire professional reputation" on the claim that Brigitte Macron is a man, which the lawsuit identifies as false and defamatory. The Macrons allege that these claims have caused "significant reputational and emotional harm."
Despite evidence disproving her claims, Owens has continued to push these theories. In fact, she has released an eight-part video series titled Becoming Brigitte to capitalize on the controversy. The Macrons' legal team asserts that Owens disregarded multiple attempts by the Macrons to clarify and retract the falsehoods and instead intensified her campaign with additional broadcasts and social media posts.
The Macrons are seeking justice to stop the "false and malicious claims" made by Owens, as they believe she continued to promote the claims even when presented with evidence showing they were false. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for future defamation lawsuits, particularly those involving public figures and the spread of misinformation across social media platforms.
This defamation lawsuit is a reminder of the challenges in protecting individuals' reputations in a world where false claims can be monetized and amplified online. The case raises important questions about accountability in the digital age, as influencers like Owens can rapidly spread their views to millions. The debate sparked by Owens' defiance centers around the boundaries of free speech and the role of legal systems in curbing the spread of harmful misinformation.
Owens maintains that the Macrons' efforts to stop her are an example of a broader "elitist conspiracy." However, the Macrons' legal team, Clare Locke LLP, a firm known for handling high-profile defamation cases, is determined to seek justice and protect their clients' reputations. As the legal battle continues, the world watches as the intersection of online influence, misinformation, and reputational damage comes to the forefront.
- Candace Owens, in tandem with her ongoing legal battle with the Macrons, has leveraged the entertainment value of the controversy to create an eight-part video series called Becoming Brigitte, using social media to further her baseless claims and generate revenue.
- The Macrons' legal team, Clare Locke LLP, is engaged in a staunch fight against the spread of misinformation, particularly in the realm of politics and general news, aiming to protect their clients' reputations and set a precedent for future defamation cases involving public figures on social media.
