Bavarian Interior Minister Herrmann Stands Firm on Border Rejections
Border Rejections Remain Acceptable According to Hermann - Border Refusal Remains Allowable, According to Herrmann's Viewpoint
In line with Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Joachim Herrmann, Bavaria's Interior Minister, continues to advocate for toughened border controls, including the rejection of asylum seekers at the border. Despite the pending legal challenges, Herrmann firmly believes in the necessity and legitimacy of these measures.
In Munich, Herrmann stated that the recent decision of the Berlin Administrative Court regarding three Somali asylum seekers might not fully grasp the specific circumstances of each case. However, Herrmann endorses the heightened border controls and rejections, adhering to the practices applied by the Federal Ministry of the Interior.
Border controls were intensified on May 7 by Alexander Dobrindt, with the exception of special cases such as children and pregnant women. Nonetheless, the Berlin Administrative Court ruled on June 3 that the rejection of these three asylum seekers was illegal due to the lack of clarity over which EU state would be responsible for their applications. The court's decision has led to the Somali applicants being sent back to Poland.
Herrmann emphasizes the relevance of Article 72 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which acknowledges the member states' authority to maintain public order and secure internal security, despite the rules of European asylum and migration law. This authority can be exercised even when it comes to asylum seekers entering from a safe third country.
As Germany continues to experience significant migration influx, Herrmann is concerned about the potential strain on local communities and the threat to the country's political stability. He believes that as long as the EU's external border protection is ineffective and comprehensive EU-wide measures are yet to be implemented, robust border control in Germany remains essential.
Despite the Berlin court's decision, Merz expresses confidence that there is still room for maneuver regarding border rejections. While the specifics of the Berlin court's decision may narrow the scope, Merz remains committed to enforcing tougher border controls.
- Joachim Herrmann
- Migration Policy
- Rejection
- Friedrich Merz
- Berlin
- Bavaria
- Munich
- Border Control
- Administrative Court
- EU
- Asylum
- Federal Ministry of the Interior
- CSU
- Alexander Dobrindt
[Enrichment Data: This brief overview provides some relevant insights on the current status of Germany's migration policy. Friedrich Merz's government, including Joachim Herrmann and Alexander Dobrindt, have implemented a hardline migration policy, focusing on stricter border controls and the rejection of asylum seekers. However, this policy has been challenged by the Berlin Administrative Court's ruling, which found that the rejection of asylum seekers is unlawful without a proper examination of their applications. Despite these legal hurdles, the government continues to push for tougher border controls. While the situation is fluid, it is clear that the migration policy continues to be a source of contention in Germany, with significant implications for asylum seekers and internal political dynamics.]
Joachim Herrmann, Bavaria's Interior Minister, stands firm on the rejection of asylum seekers at the border, advocating for this policy despite pending legal challenges. Friedrich Merz, the Chancellor, also expresses confidence in enforcing tougher border controls, acknowledging that there is still room for maneuver, despite the Berlin Administrative Court's decision. This stance on migration policy, driven by Merz's government, including Herrmann and others, has led to significant debate and contention within Germany, particularly in light of the Berlin court's ruling against the rejection of asylum seekers. This debate carries implications not only for asylum seekers but also for the internal political dynamics of the country.
