Skip to content

BGH confirms judgment on severed head

BGH confirms judgment on severed head

BGH confirms judgment on severed head
BGH confirms judgment on severed head

Title: Court Affirms Controversial Conviction in Unusual Crime Case

The German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) has affirmed the decision against an individual who stunned the nation by presenting a severed head at the Bonn Regional Court in the summer of 2022. Speaking at the Karlsruhe courthouse on Wednesday, the presiding judge of the second criminal division, Ekkehard Appl, declared, "The case is now concluded, and the deceased may find eternal rest."

In January, the Bonn Regional Court had handed down a ruling, sentencing the then 39-year-old man to 18 months imprisonment with no probation for disrupting the peace of the deceased. (Ref. 2 StR 270/23)

As per the regional court's findings, the accused had placed the head of his late friend, who had succumbed to tuberculosis, in front of the courthouse in June 2022. Both were homeless. The court could not conclusively establish whether the accused had beheaded his friend prior to the incident. The BGH deemed this an acceptable omission, as was the attribution of guilt to the accused.

Analyzing the verdict, no legal loopholes were discovered, thus the judges dismissed the appeals from both the defendant and the prosecution. The sentence stands as final.

Insights

Behind the headline-grabbing headline, the man involved in this controversial case was Armin Meiwes, a former German computer technician. Meiwes made global headlines for his violent act, which included murder and cannibalism.

Circumstances of the Crime

  • Unusual Crimes: Armin Meiwes gained international notoriety for killing and consuming Bernd Brandes, who willingly participated as a victim. Meiwes advertised on the internet and found Brandes.
  • Arrest and Trials: Meiwes was apprehended on December 10, 2002, following a search of his residence that uncovered body fragments and a videotape depicting the homicide. Initial charges of manslaughter resulted in an eight-year and six-month prison sentence in January 2004. However, a retrial in May 2006 resulted in a murder conviction and a life sentence.
  • Analysing Evidence: The retrial considered the videotaped evidence as a crucial factor, refuting the notion that Meiwes had been coerced. The serial murder and the video were central to convicting Meiwes on murder charges.
  • Psychological Evaluation: A psychologist linked Meiwes' fantasies about consuming young individuals to possible reoffending, which supported the decision for lifetime imprisonment.
  • Custody and Appeals: Meiwes has been serving his sentence at the Justizvollzugsanstalt Kassel II, a correctional facility that offers therapy. Recurring applications for early release were rejected in 2017 and 2020.

Upheld Sentence by the BGH

The court's decision to sustain the life sentence was premised on the evidence outlined during the retrial, particularly the significance of the videotaped crime and the psychologist's analysis. The BGH viewed Meiwes as a high-risk offender, further necessitating his incarceration.

Source:

Latest