Betting on sports, prohibitions, and the demise of sporting integrity

In the Glaring Glare of Gambling

Welcome to the 2025 sports world, where the stands echo with jeers, not cheers, and the joy of the game is often overshadowed by the tension of wagers. In this era of sports betting, spectators are no longer mere fans; they're high-stakes shouters, their bets serving as the fuel for excessive verbal assaults on athletes. The latest incident gracing the headlines involves a self-proclaimed "Track Bully," who publicly taunted Olympic sprinter Gabby Thomas before her race at the Grand Slam Track Philadelphia 2025, all while raking in winnings thanks to his unsportsmanlike behaviour.

This isn't innocent bystander conduct; it's brazen manipulation, often driven by an illusion of control. Gamblers no longer aim just to win; they aim to be seen and heard, their bets transformed into badges of honour. It's a delusional power trip, where athletes are reduced to mere props, and rowdy fans believe they have the power to sway the game's outcome with their vulgar words. Psychologists refer to this as the "illusion of control," a misplaced belief that their actions, such as betting or shouting from the stands, can somehow influence the outcome, which is actually random.

The Bettor, the Showman, and the Ban

Under the username @mr100kaday, our so-called anti-hero hounded Gabby Thomas with pseudo-intellectual provocation before her 100m race in Philadelphia. Shouting insults such as, "You're gonna blow up, Gabby. You're gonna fall, Gabby," he filmed his videotape opus and posted it online, captioning it with, "I made Gabby lose just by trolling her. And I won my multiplier with it."

When Gabby Thomas ended up winning the race, he not only pocketed a cool $1,700 (€1,565) from a $1,000 (€920) bet on Melissa Jefferson-Wooden's victory but also walked away with an additional $827 (€760) on a four-selection multiple. Instead of quietly savoring his winnings, he flooded the social media sphere with arrogance, further promoting his illusory influence.

But FanDuel, the betting platform, stood its ground and, in a rare display, announced:

"FanDuel condemns any abusive behavior directed at athletes in the strongest possible terms. Threats or harassment of athletes are unacceptable and have no place in sport. This customer will no longer be able to bet with FanDuel."

The Stance That Needed to Happen

Kudos to FanDuel for making a statement. This is the stance that should have been in place years ago—not just from operators but from everyone involved in the sporting ecosystem, as betting culture has long allowed the emergence of a new type of "fan" regrettably known as "couch commanders" who feel that their gambling money grants them the right to interfere in the spectacle.

This isn't just the ridiculing of an Olympic athlete; it's part of a dangerous and highly toxic pattern of harassment towards athletes driven by sports betting. Red Sox pitcher Liam Hendriks has spoken openly about the "deplorable" abuse he faces daily from frustrated bettors, while teammate Jarren Duran suffered offensive words due to his past mental health issues. In Houston, a bettor sent death threats to Lance McCullers Jr.'s family because of a lost game[1]. A 2024 NCAA study found that 12% of social media abuses suffered by college athletes stem directly from angry bettors, with the number soaring during events like March Madness, reaching 73%[2].

When the Bet Becomes a Weapon

What happened to Gabby Thomas is appalling but by no means a one-off incident. Athletes have long paid the price for the arrogance and entitlement of casino-bound fans, often subjected to verbal abuse, online harassment, and even violent attacks.

We've seen it all, from the infamous 1995 Eric Cantona's flying kick, a reaction to racist slurs from the crowd, to the stabbing of tennis player Monica Seles on court by a deranged fan unable to accept her victory, to Serena Williams' ongoing battle against stalkers, marriage proposals, and threats. The list goes on, with Naomi Osaka, Beth Mead, Leah Williamson, and countless others having been on the receiving end of such behaviour[2].

The root of the problem isn't exclusive to English-speaking countries; it permeates the global sports landscape. In Europe, efforts to combat sports manipulation have been bolstered by the Macolin Convention of the Council of Europe, which concentrates on curbing sports betting manipulation linked to illegal betting[3]. However, the problem demands more than just platform bans; it requires international cooperation and a coordinated response.

What makes this case particularly absurd is the need for validation. The subject didn't just cross the line; they burned it, danced on the ashes, and captured every moment to share it with the world. Bettors no longer just want to win; they want to be seen winning. The act of sharing and seeking likes and sponsorships is now just as important as the result itself. Bettors have inherited the narcissism of influencers and transformed betting into a spotlight performance.

As regulators struggle to keep up, players, sports platforms, and fans alike must work towards creating a more respectful and safe environment that celebrates athletic merit, not drunken dominance. The future lies not in cheering and booing, but in recognizing the silent moments of pure sportsmanship that leave us breathless.

Big Names, New Connections! Join the Summer Edition of Med-Connect SiGMA iGathering in Malta, on June 10, 2025. Connect with iGaming leaders in the main European regulatory hub and take your business to the next level.

Latest News

Watch: Growth strategy for Latin America for visionary leaders

Watch: Ed Birkin explains how market intelligence will drive sector growth in Latin America

Show all

Sports Betting in the USA

Sports betting, prohibitions, and the end of fair play

Colorado changes sports betting rules and will tax free bonuses from 2026

Show all

Enrichment Data:

The NCAA is launching targeted campaigns with partners like Signify Group to curb sports betting abuse, and investing in technology to monitor public comments across social media platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok[1].
Signify Group flagged over 3,000 abusive or threatening comments during the 2025 March Madness tournaments[2].
Signify Group actively involves law enforcement by notifying them about potential threats[1].
Sports betting companies, like FanDuel, are taking responsibility for their users' behaviour and implementing bans for people who engage in harassment[5].
The NCAA is focusing on public education and highlighting the consequences of harassment to change fan behaviour and protect student athletes[2].

In the world of sports betting, individuals like @mr100kaday use social media as a platform to harass athletes, such as Gabby Thomas, before races.
This form of harassment often stems from an illusion of control, where gamblers believe their actions can impact the outcome of games or events.
After such incidents, betting platforms like FanDuel take a public stance against such abusive behavior, banning problematic users from their services.
However, this issue extends beyond individual platforms, requiring cooperation from regulators, sports organizations, and fans to create a safer and more respectful environment for athletes.