Skip to content

Berlin shifts policy in the Gaza conflict

Critical scrutiny of Israel's military actions in the Gaza Strip persists in Berlin, with the federal government thus far only issuing firm rebukes.

Berlin alters its strategy in the Gaza conflict
Berlin alters its strategy in the Gaza conflict

Berlin shifts policy in the Gaza conflict

In a significant policy shift, Chancellor Friedrich Merz has announced a partial halt on exports of military goods to Israel due to Israel's actions in the Gaza war[1][3][4]. This move reflects growing concern in Germany about the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and widespread public outcry over Israel's military actions[2].

The decision by Germany, Israel’s second largest arms supplier after the US, has elicited international attention. Israel expressed disappointment, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu communicating this directly to Chancellor Merz by phone[1]. However, Merz emphasized that Germany still supports Israel’s right to defend itself against Hamas terrorism[3].

German public and political experts show a hardening stance against unrestricted support for Israel, driven largely by images of civilian suffering in Gaza and fears about the efficacy and morality of intensified military offensives[2]. This pause in arms exports indicates a potential strain in the historically close German-Israeli military relationship, rooted in post-Holocaust responsibility but now being reevaluated in light of humanitarian and political considerations[4].

The immediate effect is the suspension of license approvals for military equipment exports that might be used in Gaza, worth hundreds of millions of euros, putting a halt on recently granted arms deals[3]. This decision may influence other countries' policies and the broader international stance toward the conflict, as Germany is a major player in European security politics.

Germany has also emphasized the importance of humanitarian access in Gaza and called for ceasefire negotiations, hinting at a more nuanced diplomatic role[3]. However, the Central Council of Jews in Germany criticizes Merz's policy shift, stating that it endangers Israel's existence.

The Israeli Security Cabinet has approved a plan to take the city of Gaza, which includes principles such as disarming the Islamic Hamas, the return of all hostages, demilitarization of the Gaza Strip, Israeli security control of the coastal region, and the establishment of a civilian administration that would not be subject to Hamas or the Palestinian Authority[4]. Netanyahu has stated that Israel's goal is not to take over the Gaza Strip, but to free it from Hamas and enable a peaceful government there.

Merz criticized Israel's decision to take harsher action in the Gaza Strip, stating that it makes it increasingly difficult to see how the goals of releasing hostages, achieving a ceasefire, and improving the humanitarian situation in Gaza can be achieved[1]. He also emphasized the federal government's concern for the civilian population in the Gaza Strip and urged the Israeli government to enable comprehensive access for aid deliveries.

This news article provides a clear and concise account of Germany's decision to partially halt arms exports to Israel amid the Gaza conflict, its international implications, and the reactions from various parties involved.

  1. The pause in arms exports to Israel, a move initiated by Germany due to the ongoing Gaza war, has sparked discussions about war-and-conflicts and general-news, as other countries may now reconsider their own policies towards the region.
  2. Apart from military conflicts, the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and crime-and-justice issues are also at the forefront of German politics, with political experts showing a hardening stance against unrestricted support for Israel due to concerns about civilian suffering and the morality of intensified military offensives.
  3. Amid the diplomatic tussle, car-accidents and accidents may seem irrelevant, but the suspension of license approvals for military equipment exports amounts to hundreds of millions of euros, impacting the broader international stance toward the conflict and European security politics significantly.

Read also:

    Latest