Skip to content

Before the ECJ ruling: what's important in the Super League dispute

Before the ECJ ruling: what's important in the Super League dispute

Before the ECJ ruling: what's important in the Super League dispute
Before the ECJ ruling: what's important in the Super League dispute

The Future of European Club Soccer: Understanding the ECJ Ruling on the Super League Dispute

The fate of European football is hanging in the balance as the European Court of Justice (ECJ) prepares to deliver its ruling on the Super League dispute. For over two years, both sides have been locked in a battle that's been presented as a legal showdown capable of deciding the future of soccer. But what exactly is at stake in this Super League debate?

On the 9th of this month, the much-anticipated judgement in case C333/21 will be announced. Although it's not likely to immediately introduce a competing product or abruptly end the Champions League, it will send a powerful message about who has the right to decide on the matches of top clubs and how.

The Super League Controversy: A Brief Overview

Two-and-a-half years ago, twelve elite European clubs attempted to shake up the football world by announcing their intention to establish a Super League to rival the established Champions League. The ensuing outcry from leagues, fans, and politicians led to UEFA threatening to exclude players from all competitions, and the English teams quickly withdrew. However, Real Madrid and Barcelona persisted, employing RTL manager Bernd Reichart to lobby clubs across Europe in support of the project.

Why the ECJ is Making a Ruling

The ECJ now has the responsibility to decide if UEFA and FIFA are acting as a cartel and abusing their dominant positions in the soccer competition market. The Super League Company has accused them of such actions, citing the threats of sanctions they've levied against the league. The ECJ will also consider whether these actions violate fundamental freedoms like the free movement of workers or the freedom of establishment.

The Importance of the Advocate General's Opinion

The Opinion of the Advocate General, who is an expert adviser to the judges, offers valuable insight into how the court may rule. Last year, the Advocate General nearly unanimously supported UEFA, stating that the Super League could establish its own league but would then be barred from participating in FIFA or UEFA competitions without their permission. Although the opinion is not legally binding, it could suggest that the judges will make a similar decision.

What Happens After the Ruling?

The ECJ's decision will only interpret questions of EU law and leave the specific case to be decided by a national court. In the case of the Super League, the case was referred to a court in Madrid, which will need to follow the ECJ's guidance.

The Stance of UEFA and German Clubs

UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin has vehemently criticized the Super League, referring to it as "the so-called Super League" and declaring it to be "dead." German clubs, such as Bayern and Dortmund, have been consistent in their support for UEFA and have not been linked to the Super League initiative.

Structuring a Super League

The initial concept for the Super League envisioned a permanent lineup of top clubs. However, the latest model proposed several divisions for 60 to 80 teams, offering guaranteed European appearances and mitigating the risk of relegation even during poor seasons.

The Future of the Champions League

UEFA's competitions are set for a drastic overhaul from next season. The traditional group stage will be replaced with a league system where 36 clubs will compete in 8-match blocks against 8 different opponents. The top 8 teams will secure direct entry into the knockout round, while the remaining teams compete in play-offs to reach the round of 16. This change is expected to significantly increase revenue, although the Super League proponents argue that that would result in even more insignificant matches.

The Impact of the ECJ Ruling on FIFA and UEFA

The ECJ's ruling could have vast implications for FIFA and UEFA by challenging their dominance over the European football market. The decision could lead to the establishment of new competitions, creating greater competitive expansion and allowing for more exciting and decisive matches.

Juventus Turin, a prominent Super League advocate, has faced intense backlash from UEFA and other soccer associations, raising questions about its future role in FIFA and UEFA tournaments.

The Role of RTL and the German Government

RTL, a leading European media company, has been instrumental in promoting the Super League, with Bernd Reichart serving as a lobbyist for the project's organizers. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and other German politicians have expressed concerns about the impact the Super League could have on German soccer.

Conclusion

The ECJ's ruling in the Super League dispute will have far-reaching consequences for the future of European football. Whether the ruling favors UEFA and FIFA or encourages the establishment of a Super League will depend on several factors, including the legal interpretation of cartel behavior and compliance with fundamental freedoms. Regardless of the outcome, the decision will reshape the governance of European soccer and pave the way for a new era in club competitions.

Sources:

  • Enrichment Data (2023)

Enrichment Data (2023):

In December 2023, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) delivered its final verdict in the European Super League (ESL) dispute, leaning strongly in favor of FIFA and UEFA. The ECJ concluded that FIFA and UEFA's statutes requiring prior approval for interclub competitions were unlawful under EU competition law. This ruling had significant implications for the future of European club soccer, challenging the traditional structure of FIFA and UEFA and paving the way for new competitive opportunities in European football. The decision also raised questions about the long-term impact on clubs like Real Madrid and Barcelona, who are key players in ESL developments.

Additional Insights:

  • The ECJ's decision marked a turning point in the governance of European soccer, leaving a legacy that will shape the evolution of club competitions for years to come.
  • Special attention should be paid to the impact of this ruling on the relationship between FIFA, UEFA, and national associations, as well as the potential for other European leagues to challenge their dominance.
  • The future role of Real Madrid and Barcelona in the European soccer landscape, as well as the broader implications for smaller European clubs, will be crucial to monitor in the aftermath of the ECJ ruling.

Latest