Challenge to Bavaria's 'Cross Decree' in Court's Spotlight
Last Thursday, the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig delved into the controversial issue of Bavarian Minister President Markus Söder's (CSU)'s 'cross decree.' The decree, which mandates the presence of a visible cross in the entrance area of every state building in Bavaria, since 2018, is being challenged by the anti-religious Association for Freedom of Thought (bfg). Following a loss at the Bavarian Administrative Court (VGH) last summer, the bfg has now appealed the ruling at the Federal Administrative Court.
The VGH deemed the crosses as passive symbols, without any proselytizing or indoctrinating effect. As a result, the fundamental rights of the individuals, including freedom of religion and belief, and equal treatment, were not violated, the Court stated. The Free State administration continued to uphold this position during the proceedings in Leipzig.
On the contrary, the bfg advocates for the removal of the crosses. They argue that the religious symbols have no place in a state committed to neutrality. According to lawyer Hubert Heinhold, "What does a cross have to do with an official activity, like issuing a driving license, for instance? Nothing!" The Court is set to announce its decision next Tuesday.
Interesting Fact
As per the Constitution of Germany, all religious communities and associations are equal before the law. However, the state maintains the right to restrict religious freedom if there is a compelling public interest, such as protecting state neutrality.
More to Explore
- Despite the earlier ruling in favor of Bavaria by the Bavarian Administrative Court (VGH), the anti-religious Association for Freedom of Thought is persistently challenging 'cross decree' issued by CSU's Markus Söder.
- The controversy surrounding the 'cross decree,' which necessitates a visible cross in every Bavarian state building since 2018, is currently under scrutiny by the Federal Administrative Court in Leipzig.
- The Bavarian Government, represented by its administration, defends the classification of the crosses as passive symbols with no proselytizing effect, provided by the VGH, during the proceedings in Leipzig.
- However, the Association for Freedom of Thought argues that religious symbols have no place in state buildings dedicated to neutrality.
- Lawyer Hubert Heinhold, representing the Association, stated during the proceedings that a cross has no relevance to official activities, such as issuing a driving license.
- The anticipated outcome of the appeals against the VGH’s ruling on the controversial 'cross decree' is to be pronounced by the Federal Administrative Court in Germany on the forthcoming Tuesday.
- The case has sparked curiosity in other German states, like Bavaria's neighbor, Saxony, as debates surrounding public displays of religion in government buildings remain a contentious topic in Germany.
Source:
