Athletic Figure Philippa York raises concerns about British Cycling and its alleged issues within the LGBTQ+ community spectrum.
British Cycling, the governing body for the sport in Great Britain, is swimming in a sea of controversy, drowning in accusations of transphobia, despite attempts to sail smoothly. According to prominent figure, Philippa York, this org is more trouble than a flat tire during a time trial.
Philippa, once known as Robert Millar, is no stranger to cycling, having won the King of the Mountains jersey at the Tour de France, clinching victory in all three of cycling's Grand Tours, bagging the British national championship, and taking the Tour of Britain crown. After hanging up her helmet, she briefly dip-toed into coaching at British Cycling before stepping off the bike for good, eventually transitioning. Now, an esteemed member of the media, author, and trans advocate, Philippa left an impactful mark on the sport.
In an exclusive chat with The Guardian, she raises a red flag: there's still mountains to climb when it comes to supporting trans athletes in sport. Although understanding has improved, it certainly hasn't led to acceptance.
Philippa shares her dismay about previously being invited to join British Cycling's advisory group on diversity and inclusion, only to part ways over their mismanaged mess involving trans athlete, Emily Bridges. Bridges found herself barred from competing in May 2023 when new rules limiting trans women from female events took root.
Trans women are now relegated to British Cycling's "open" category, competing alongside men. Before she publicly came out as a trans woman, Bridges was part of the male senior academy program in 2019. The sudden ban left her potential track team spot unclaimed.
"She showed promise, but she didn't dominate," Philippa said. "Emily was 10 or 12 seconds shy of the world record, and that could've been her ticket onto the team."
British Cycling maintains they strive for inclusivity, but their competition policies aim to ensure fairness, a stance echoed by most other sports. Critics, like Philippa, dispute this—she claims British Cycling harbors "a real problem with the whole LGBTQ+ community." She also alleges that some employees penned a letter demanding trans women be kept out, actions that would have landed them on the unemployment line in other organizations.
British Cycling countered with, "We believe cycling is for everyone, and we aim to welcome all. Our rules aim to secure fairness in competition while providing chances for everyone to participate. The open category, which includes transgender women, men, and non-binary individuals, stands available."
Despite their assurances, Emily Bridges insists this policy amounts to a de facto ban: "A ban is a ban. You can call it an open category, but we're women—we should be able to compete in the women's division."
[Get in the cycling loop with our Leadout Newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox!]
The controversy breeds a larger debate: should transgender athletes be allowed to compete in their identified gender or should fairness in competition take precedence? Philippa York's tale and Emily Bridges' journey reveal the complexities of inclusivity in sport, right in the heart of British Cycling.
"Philippa York, speaking about the predicament of trans athletes in British Cycling, stated that the debate on whether transgender athletes should be allowed to compete in their identified gender or if fairness in competition should take priority, is a topic that extends beyond general-news and politics, greatly impacting sports and sports-analysis."
"The issue of transphobia in British Cycling, sparked by the ban on trans athlete Emily Bridges from competing in the women's division and her subsequent relegation to the 'open' category, raises questions about the governing body's commitment to inclusivity in sports, stirring controversy not only within the cycling community but also sparking discussions in politics and general news."
