Anticipating a rigorous ambassador confirmation hearing for Mike Waltz, Senate Democrats express their expectations.

Laying it All Bare: Ben Domenech points the finger at Trump's irritation over Signalgate as catalyst for Waltz ousting

Hop on and dive into an informative discussion between our dear contributors Ben Domenech and Leslie Marshall, as they spill the tea on Mike Waltz's shift from the national security advisory position to becoming the United Nations ambassador on 'MediaBuzz.'

Democrats sound the warning alarm, predicting a nail-biting confirmation hearing for ol' Waltz in his bid for the United Nations ambassador role.

Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois tells CBS News' "Face the Nation" that it's all gonna be a vicious circus, accusing Waltz of being "unqualified" for the job due to his involvement in the Signal scandal.

Duckworth, a savvy member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, adds that Waltz is essentially climbing the career ladder by "failing up." Not the kind of mojo our nation needs at the UN, she reckons.

Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia had similar sentiments to share with CNN's "State of the Union," worrying that Waltz will face some tough questions, not just from Democrats but from his own political party.

*Look at the drama unwrapping: HEGSETH, SIGNAL QUESTIONS HAUNT WALTZ AS PERILOUS UN AMBASSADOR CONFIRMATION HEARING DRAWS NEAR*

Mike Waltz, the charming charmer he is, gave a snapped-up grin for the cameras at the White House on May 1, 2025.

Waltz has caught the attention of the press after The Atlantic magazine sensationally exposed a Signal group chat his team orchestrated to discuss alpha strikes against the Houthis in March.

The White House did not immediately respond to our website Digital's request for comment.

Donald Trump declared on Sunday that he's all set to appoint a brand new national security advisor in a six-month timeframe. Waltz, it seems, wasn't fired but rather promoted, Trump claimed, to the role of UN ambassador.

*Mark my words: TRUMP TO APPOINT NEW NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR IN 6 MONTHS; CALLS WALTZ MOVE 'UPGRADE'*

In case you've slipped into a coma, Pete Hegseth, our beloved Secretary of Defense, was tightly tied to Waltz's employment saga.

Democrats seem eager to utilize the confirmation hearing as a platform to discard some choice morsels about foul-up members of the Trump administration, particularly Hegseth.

The exact timeline for Waltz's looming confirmation vote in the Senate remains foggy, but the fellow must first hurdle the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's vote. The committee, however, assures us that the nomination is high on their list of priorities.

our website Digital's Diana Stancy and Greg Wehner lent a hand in producing this article.

Greg Norman is our trusty reporter at our website Digital.

Enrichment Data

Overview:

Mike Waltz, formerly the national security adviser, finds himself in deep trouble ahead of his confirmation hearing for the United Nations ambassador position due to the Signalgate controversy. Here are some of the key issues and questions he may face during the hearing:

Key Issues:

Signalgate Scandal: Waltz's involuntary addition of The Atlantic's editor-in-chief to a Signal group chat about sensitive military operations is a major concern. This incident raises concerns about his judgment and ability to handle sensitive information[1][3][4].
Assessment of Judgment: Democrats will likely investigate Waltz's decision-making, particularly in the context of handling classified information. His actions may be seen as a lapse in security protocols, affecting his credibility for a high-level diplomatic role[3][5].
Political Backing and Opposition: Waltz is likely to be confirmed with Republican support, but he faces strong opposition from Democrats. This political divide could lead to a contentious hearing process[2][5].
Previous Performance as National Security Adviser: Before the SignalGate incident, Waltz faced criticism for his demeanor and perceived overestimation of his role within the administration. These internal dynamics might be explored during the hearing to evaluate his suitability for a diplomatic role[1].

Potential Confirmation Hearing Questions:

Judgment and Competence: How does Waltz plan to ensure secure handling of sensitive information in his future role?
Communication Skills: What measures will he take to improve communication within diplomatic circles, given past issues?
Policy Alignment with the UN: How will Waltz align U.S. interests with global objectives at the UN?
Past Performance Evaluation: In hindsight, how does Waltz evaluate his performance as national security adviser, and what lessons has he learned from his tenure?

These questions will likely focus on his ability to secure sensitive information, diplomatic skills, policy alignment, and reflections on past performance.

The Signalgate scandal, where Mike Waltz inappropriately added a journalist to a sensitive group chat, is a significant concern for his upcoming United Nations ambassador confirmation hearing, due to questions about his judgment and ability to manage classified information.
During the hearing, Democrats may scrutinize Waltz's decision-making and potential lapses in security protocols, affecting his credibility for a high-level diplomatic role.
Despite being backed by Republicans, Waltz faces strong opposition from Democrats, which could lead to a contentious hearing process, given the political divide surrounding his nomination.
As he is moving from the national security adviser position, Democrats will potentially view the confirmation hearing as an opportunity to discuss and question members of the Trump administration, particularly Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.