Alvise argues for his contested messages as a form of "political critique" and "expression of free speech" before the Supreme Court, against a public prosecutor from Valencia.
Sassy Sally's Scoop: Euro-MP Alvise Pérez, known as the party leader of Se Acabó La Fiesta (SALF), has found himself in hot water, testifying before the Supreme Court for spreading messages perceived as hateful towards Valencia prosecutor Susana Gisbert. He argued these messages were merely "political criticisms" and expressions of "freedom of speech."
The case revolves around several messages Alvise posted on his Telegram channel from January to February 2024, where he published Gisbert's image and criticized her work to over 40,000 followers. The harsh responses from his followers, which included insults and threats, potentially put Gisbert's personal life in danger, the judge claimed.
In a heated statement, Alvise voiced his frustration over these kinds of comments now landing him before the Supreme Court. He claimed, "There are people who want to imprison citizens who criticize mass immigration."
Telegram Troubles
One of Alvise's Telegram publications targeted the "people responsible for ideological persecution for hate crimes," including Gisbert, declaring these individuals were attempting to imprison citizens for stating that "mass illegal immigration is an invasion." He even shared an image of Gisbert, focusing attention on her as the one "demanding 3 years in prison and 3,600 euros in fines for anyone who tweets the word 'immigration' and 'invasion' together."
Additionally, the court regarded Alvise allowing the dissemination of Gisbert's social media profiles, resulting in her receiving harassment.
The Supreme Court summons Alvise Pérez to voluntarily testify on June 19 regarding his messages against Valencia prosecutor Susana Gisbert.
Voluntary Testimony
Judge Juan Ramón Berdugo issued a provision on June 5, offering Alvise the chance to appear voluntarily, without having to lift the immunity that protects him as an Euro-MP.
The case initiated by Valencia's Instruction Court number 5 followed a complaint filed by Gisbert against Alvise for a potential crime of insulting a public official, coercion, and hate speech through social networks.
A Busy Courtroom for Pérez
Besides the case involving Gisbert, Alvise has two additional cases open against him in the Supreme Court, and a fourth case pending.
In one of these open cases, the court is looking into his actions regarding the "dissemination in 2021 of a false COVID PCR of then-Minister of Health Salvador Illa," now president of the Catalan Government. Alvise maintained he did not act in "bad faith" and claimed the document was widely circulating on social media.
Another case investigates the allegation that Alvise accepted 100,000 euros from a businessman to illegally fund his party's European election campaign.
The pending case concerns the dissemination via Telegram of private conversations between the former Secretary of State for Security, Francisco Martínez, and a journalist, which may potentially constitute a crime of revealing secrets.
- The average citizen might find it concerning that Euro-MP Alvise Pérez, leader of Se Acabó La Fiesta (SALF), has multiple cases open against him in the Supreme Court, involving accusations of hate speech, coercion, and potential fraud in policy-and-legislation areas such as immigration and COVID-related matters.
- Among the general news headlines, the voluntary testimony summon by the Supreme Court on June 19 for Alvise Pérez, due to his controversial messages against Valencia prosecutor Susana Gisbert, is a significant development in the ongoing discussions about the bounderies of freedom of speech in politics and public discourse.
