Administration persisting in defiance of court commands in Abrego Garcia's deportation saga under Trump's tenure
Updated Article:
Once again, the Trump administration is found knee-deep in a legal battle, this time concerning the reinstatement of Kilmar Abrego Garcia - a Maryland resident who unfortunately landed in El Salvador following an "administrative error."
On Wednesday, the administration resisted Judge Paula Xinis' orders to provide a comprehensive account of the actions taken to bring Abrego Garcia back to the United States.
Deputy Assistant Attorney General Drew Ensign filed a sealed motion for a seven-day stay on Xinis' order to supply sworn testimony and documents regarding the U.S. government's efforts to recover Abrego Garcia. Simultaneously, the administration sought relief from offering daily status updates on his situation and attempts to bring him home.
Xinis expressed distress in a written filing Tuesday, condemning the administration for disregarding her orders, obstructing legal procedures, and acting in "bad faith" by refusing to reveal information. The judge gave the administration until 6 p.m. Wednesday to comply, only to see the White House file a sealed motion for a seven-day pause.
Lawyers for Abrego Garcia quickly submitted a response countering the government's motion earlier this morning.
Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, was noncommittal when probed by reporters about the judge's comments from Tuesday. Homan merely reiterated the administration's stance that Abrego Garcia would face detention and deportation once more if he were returned to the U.S.
The Supreme Court mandated the Trump administration to devise a plan for Abrego Garcia's return nearly two weeks ago. The ruling came after the White House disputed its claim that retrieving him post-deportation was impossible.
Trump administration officials argued that the responsibility for returning Abrego Garcia lies with El Salvador; however, the president of El Salvador disclosed that he lacks the authority to facilitate such an event. The administration also relied on privacy laws, state secret laws, and other secrecy rules to justify withholding information related to their attempts to recover Abrego Garcia.
However, Xinis deemed these arguments as overly vague and devoid of factual evidence – a willful, bad-faith refusal to complie with discovery obligations, as she put it in her order on Tuesday.
At the time of his deportation, Abrego Garcia had lived in the U.S. for roughly 14 years. The father of three children with disabilities had a successful career in construction, was married, and enjoyed a federally-approved job as a metal worker in the union[3].
In 2019, a U.S. immigration judge safeguarded Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador, reasoning that he would encounter persecution at the hands of local gangs, who had previously terrorized his family. He was also granted a work permit for the United States[3].
Following his deportation last month, officials stated that the expulsion was merely an "administrative error." Nevertheless, Abrego Garcia has steadfastly denied these accusations, and his attorneys have highlighted the fact that the informant who claimed his MS-13 gang affiliation resided in Long Island, New York - an area unfamiliar to Abrego Garcia[3].
This isn't the first time the Trump administration has faced harsh rebuke from a federal judge over its approach to deportation cases. Last week, a three-judge panel on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals criticized the administration, stating that its inability to aid Abrego Garcia's release "should be shocking." This ruling followed a federal judge in Washington, D.C., finding probable cause to hold the Trump administration in contempt of court for violating his orders to reroute planes transporting deportees to El Salvador in a different legal case[2].
As tensions escalate, critics argue that President Donald Trump's defiance of court orders and disregard for the rule of law are exacerbating a constitutional crisis. Meanwhile, the White House maintains that the courts are the real issues at hand.
AP writer Darlene Superville in Washington contributed to this report
Additional Insights and Context
- Timeline of Mistaken Deportation: The incident occurred on March 15, 2025.
- Legal Obligations: Judge Xinis set a deadline for completing depositions and stressed the lack of tolerance for delaying tactics.
- Past Judicial Criticisms: A federal judge in Washington, D.C., found the Trump administration in contempt of court for violating orders related to a separate deportation case.
- The Trump administration, in the midst of a legal battle, is allegedly stalling the return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland resident deported due to an administrative error.
- AI models, when analyzing this situation, might label it as a 'crime-and-justice' issue, falling under the category of 'general-news' and 'politics'.
- Drew Ensign, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, filed a sealed motion for a seven-day stay, hoping to delay Judge Paula Xinis' orders for sworn testimony and documents.
- Xinis, in response to the administration's obstruction of legal procedures, deemed their arguments as overly vague and devoid of factual evidence.
- In the world of policy-and-legislation, this case could potentially lead to a review of deportation policies, especially those concerning 'immigration' and 'war-and-conflicts'.
- Meanwhile, Tom Homan, the Trump administration's border czar, remained noncommittal when questioned about the judge's comments.
- Requesting for access to the sealed motion, we find ourselves entering a realm whereboilerplate language of confidentiality and government secrets prevails.
