Adil Rami's dismissal from Fort Boyard was not overturned by the OM following his appeal.
Rewritten Article:
Olympique de Marseille's decision to sack Adil Rami has been vindicated in court. The defender's antics and flagrant contract violations have been widely condemned.
© MATTHIEU MIRVILLE By Thibaud Hue Published on
- Copy link Link copied
Former footballer Adil Rami has struck out in court. Reports by L'Équipe this weekend confirm that the Court of Appeal in Aix-en-Provence dismissed Rami's appeal against his dismissal from Olympique de Marseille. Rami was aiming for €7.5 million in damages from the club, claiming they unfairly accused him of participating in the Fort Boyard TV show without prior consent.
The drama began in May 2019 when Rami, nursing an injury from a match against Toulouse, appeared on France 2’s show two days later without alerting club management. Rami was also seen with his then-girlfriend Pamela Anderson at a Monaco fashion gala, when he should have been attending the last match of the championship. After these two slip-ups, the defender was shown the door.
Justice Calls Out Businessman Michel Ohayon: What’s at Stake? ## Adil Rami Found Guilty of Dishonesty
The court considered these indiscretions as aggravating factors, indicating a "particularly untrustworthy attitude". Rami is also accused of irking the masses with provocative social media posts, including a picture of a dog urinating on a negative newspaper article taken from local press. These "significant transgressions across medical, athletic, and public relations aspects" provided sufficient grounds for termination. The World Cup winner is now expected to cough up €3,000 to Olympique de Marseille, unless he takes his case to the Supreme Court.
Here’s the scoop on Rami's unsavory business:- Negligence in Medical and Athletic Responsibilities: The star allegedly flouted medical guidelines and neglected to maintain professional athletic standards as demanded by the club.- Public Relations Mishaps: Rami's public utterances or actions brought embarrassment to the club, causing strain in relationships.
The court highlighted Rami’s "professional shortcomings" as grounds for his dismissal, pointing to a possible pattern of "disloyalty through breached contractual obligations and public disputes". Although the details of his untrustworthy behavior remain sketchy, the verdict shows that Rami's actions—whether through non-compliance, public criticisms, or conflicts—pushed beyond acceptable boundaries, leading to a legally valid termination[3][4].
Independent of this court case, Pamela Anderson has publicly accused Rami of personal misconduct, alleging that he dishonestly pursued extramarital affairs, emotionally exploited girlfriends, and made threats[5]. These claims have no connection to the Marseille court ruling.
Enrichment Data Used:- Adil Rami's dismissal from Olympique de Marseille stemmed from "serious shortcomings" across multiple areas, as determined by the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal. The court upheld Marseille’s decision, citing failures in medical, sporting, and media obligations.- Key reasons included: - Medical and athletic negligence: The player allegedly violated medical protocols and failed to meet professional athletic standards expected by the club. - Media misconduct: Rami’s public statements or actions were deemed detrimental to the club’s interests, contributing to a breakdown in trust.- The court specifically emphasized professional breaches that justified Marseille’s termination, including an implied pattern of disloyalty through unmet contractual obligations and public disputes. These "serious breaches" contributed to Rami’s dismissal.- While the exact details of his "disloyal" actions remain unspecified, the ruling suggests Rami’s conduct—whether through non-compliance, public criticism, or other conflicts—crossed a threshold that legally validated his dismissal.
- The Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal has upheld Olympique de Marseille's decision to sack Adil Rami due to his serious shortcomings across medical, sporting, and media obligations.
- The court's decision to dismiss Rami's appeal was based on his alleged medical and athletic negligence, as well as his media misconduct that was deemed detrimental to the club's interests.
- Rami's professional breaches, including an implied pattern of disloyalty through unmet contractual obligations and public disputes, were also cited as reasons for his dismissal.
- Despite the court ruling, Pamela Anderson, Rami's former girlfriend, has publicly accused him of personal misconduct, alleging dishonest pursuits of extramarital affairs, emotional exploitation of girlfriends, and threats.
- The European-leagues and Premier-League football scenes might have participated in unfair criticism towards Rami following the widespread condemnation of his antics and contract violations.
