Skip to content

"A tragically gruesome ending"

Judgment with an unpleasant flavor: In the case of the Solingen arson trial, all parties involved - prosecution, defense, and court - have ruled out racism as the primary motivation.

A tragic demise occurred.
A tragic demise occurred.

"A tragically gruesome ending"

In a landmark ruling, the Wuppertal state court in Germany has sentenced Daniel S. to life imprisonment for deliberately setting fire to an apartment building in Solingen, which tragically took the lives of four members of a Bulgarian-Turkish family, including two children.

The guilty verdict, announced on Wednesday, came after a criminal trial that began in January. Daniel S. was found guilty of four counts of murder and 21 counts of attempted murder. The building he set ablaze was the family's home in Grünwaldstraße.

The motive behind the arson attack remains a subject of debate. While the public prosecutor believes that Daniel S. acted out of personal frustration and rental debts, evidence presented in court suggested a probable far-right extremist or racist motive. Investigators found a note containing a racist poem in a garage used by Daniel S., and far-right extremist content was discovered on a hard drive in his home. However, prosecutors could not establish clear links to organized extremist groups.

Seda Basay-Yildiz, the co-plaintiff's lawyer, uncovered evidence suggesting that Daniel S. had ties to extreme right-wing propaganda. Despite this, Judge Jochen Kötter ruled out racism as a motive, stating that Daniel S. set the fire due to his familiarity with the building and its accessibility.

The Zhilov family's relatives were present as co-plaintiffs in the trial. The Rheinland Victim Support Service, which has been supporting the family, expressed dissatisfaction with the verdict, stating that it fails to acknowledge the existential experiences of those affected.

Lawyers for Daniel S. argued for a life sentence with subsequent preventive detention. The court, however, sentenced him to life imprisonment with subsequent preventive detention.

The investigating authorities were relieved at the arrest of Daniel S., as it put an end to suspicions of a second racist arson attack. Jochen Ohliger, one of Daniel S.'s lawyers, dismissed any suggestion of a right-wing ideology. His colleague, however, claimed that Daniel S. would have set fire to the building even if the AfD's local office was inside.

Jan-Rober Hildebrandt, from the Rheinland Victim Support Service, stated that for victims, justice means being recognized as vulnerable individuals with a right to dignity and societal solidarity. He added that today's verdict marks the end of a process, but not the end of responsibility.

The trial in support of Kamil Zhilov and his family continues to resonate, serving as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of hate and intolerance.

  1. The verdict in the trial, which centered around war-and-conflicts, politics, general-news, and crime-and-justice, sentenced Daniel S. to life imprisonment for a racially motivated arson attack that resulted in the death of a Bulgarian-Turkish family, including two children.
  2. The trial, sparked by a tragic incident in Solingen, Germany, also brought forth discussions about Daniel S.'s potential ties to far-right extremism in the realm of politics and crime-and-justice, with evidence suggesting his involvement in such groups.

Read also:

    Latest