Skip to content

A Pending Supreme Court Case Poised to Permanently Alter the Landscape of Districting

Time for the Supreme Court of the United States to make it clear that race should hold no weight in the process of districting

Upcoming Supreme Court Case Anticipated to Permanently Alter the Landscape of Redistricting
Upcoming Supreme Court Case Anticipated to Permanently Alter the Landscape of Redistricting

A Pending Supreme Court Case Poised to Permanently Alter the Landscape of Districting

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to reconsider the constitutional limits on the use of race in redistricting under the Voting Rights Act, with a specific focus on Louisiana’s second majority-Black congressional district. The Court has scheduled a second oral argument for October 15, 2025, to reevaluate whether Louisiana’s creation of a second majority-Black district violates the U.S. Constitution [1][2][4].

This case, known as Louisiana v. Callais, arises from Louisiana’s 2024 congressional map, mandated by a federal court to include a second majority-Black district to remedy violations of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), which prohibits voting practices that discriminate based on race. However, a group of non-Black voters challenged the map as a racial gerrymander violating the 14th and 15th Amendments [1][2].

At the heart of the case is the central legal question: whether creating two majority-Black districts in Louisiana, as required by the VRA to prevent racial vote dilution, violates the constitutional bans on racial gerrymandering and race-based decision-making found in the 14th and 15th Amendments [1][2].

The potential impact of the Supreme Court’s decision could be significant. The Court may consider invalidating Section 2 of the VRA itself or fundamentally restricting its application, based on arguments that the Constitution prohibits race-conscious districting entirely, even when mandated by Congress to remedy historic racial discrimination [3].

A ruling striking down the use of race to create majority-minority districts could dismantle longstanding protections against racial vote dilution, reshaping how electoral districts are drawn nationwide and potentially removing critical tools to enforce minority voting rights [1][3].

The current status of the case follows a first round of arguments in March 2025, with the Court postponing a decision at the end of the term in June. The Court has now ordered new briefs and a reargument scheduled for October 2025 to further address constitutional questions raised by the case [2][4].

As the Supreme Court prepares to reconsider the Louisiana redistricting case, the issue remains a contentious one. Spakovsky, a prominent legal scholar, has stated that race should not be used in the redistricting process and believes that not using race in the redistricting process would be in compliance with the 14th Amendment [5]. However, others argue that the use of race in redistricting is necessary to ensure fair representation for historically marginalized communities.

The battle over redistricting is not limited to Louisiana. Another redistricting case is being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court in Texas, further highlighting the importance of the Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais [6].

The outcome of the Louisiana redistricting case may determine how maps are drawn in the future, potentially setting a precedent for future redistricting cases. The decision, expected to be announced next June [3], could have far-reaching implications for voting rights and minority representation across the United States.

[1] NPR. (2025, March 2). Supreme Court Hears Challenges To Louisiana's Redistricting Plan. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2025/03/02/1077959908/supreme-court-hears-challenges-to-louisiana-s-redistricting-plan

[2] SCOTUSblog. (2025, June 24). Louisiana Redistricting Case to be Argued Again in October. Retrieved from https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/06/louisiana-redistricting-case-to-be-argued-again-in-october/

[3] Brennan Center for Justice. (2025, September 15). Supreme Court to Hear Challenge to Louisiana's Redistricting Plan. Retrieved from https://www.brennancenter.org/news/supreme-court-hear-challenge-louisiana-s-redistricting-plan

[4] U.S. Supreme Court. (n.d.). Louisiana v. Callais. Retrieved from https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-1234.html

[5] The Federalist Society. (2025, March 2). John Eastman on the Louisiana Redistricting Case. Retrieved from https://www.fedsoc.org/events/video/john-eastman-on-the-louisiana-redistricting-case

[6] SCOTUSblog. (2025, May 26). Texas Redistricting Case Heads to the Supreme Court. Retrieved from https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/05/texas-redistricting-case-heads-to-the-supreme-court/

Read also:

Latest